Dick's Sporting Goods vs Wayfair
DKS and W side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How DKS and W compare
Wayfair is the larger company, worth 1.2 times as much as Dick's Sporting Goods ($15.3B against $13.3B).
Dick's Sporting Goods grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (53.5% versus 7.9% for Wayfair).
Dick's Sporting Goods keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 4.0% compared with −1.2% at Wayfair.
Dick's Sporting Goods pays a dividend yielding 3.3%; Wayfair does not pay one.
Dick's Sporting Goods scores higher on the StockData Score (10 against 4 for Wayfair), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | DKS | W |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $13.3B | $15.3B |
| Share price | $149.70 | $111.92 |
| Change, 1 year | −32.8% | 0.18% |
| Change, 5 years | 8.0% | −59.3% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.11 | 2.74 |
| Employees | 105K | 13K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 10 (better) | 4 |
| Valuation score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Performance score | 1 | 1 |
| Health score | 2 | 2 |
| Dividend score | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 16.1× | – |
| P/S | 0.6× (better) | 1.2× |
| P/B | 2.3× | – |
| EV/EBITDA | 7.0× (better) | 30.6× |
| P/FCF | 55.6× | 25.5× (better) |
| FCF yield | 1.8% | 3.9% (better) |
| Fair value | $163.75 | $46.22 |
| Margin of safety | 8.6% (better) | −142% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 53.5% (better) | 7.9% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 12.4% (better) | −2.5% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −28.5% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −35.0% | – |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 11.8% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 32.1% (better) | 30.0% |
| Operating margin | 5.5% (better) | 2.1% |
| Net margin | 4.0% (better) | −1.2% |
| FCF margin | 1.1% | 4.6% (better) |
| Return on equity | 18.5% | – |
| Return on invested capital | 24.2% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | 2.68 |
| Interest coverage | 16.4× | – |
| Current ratio | 1.48 (better) | 0.67 |
| Altman Z-score | 2.72 | 3.56 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 6 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 3.3% | – |
| Payout ratio | 52.8% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 3 | – |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 31.1% | – |
| Buyback yield | 1.4% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 4.7% (better) | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 77.7% | 89.5% |
| Held by insiders | 73.4% | 15.0% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$41.5M (better) | −$199M |
| Superinvestors holding | 3 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 47.7% | 8.4% |
Go deeper
- DKS stock overview
- DKS income statement
- DKS valuation and score
- W stock overview
- W income statement
- W valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.