Deckers Outdoor vs Under Armour
DECK and UAA side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How DECK and UAA compare
Deckers Outdoor is the larger company, worth 5.5 times as much as Under Armour ($11.8B against $2.2B).
Deckers Outdoor grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (6.3% versus −4.2% for Under Armour).
Deckers Outdoor keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 19.0% compared with −9.8% at Under Armour.
Deckers Outdoor scores higher on the StockData Score (20 against 4 for Under Armour), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | DECK | UAA |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $11.8B | $2.2B |
| Share price | $88.38 | $5.01 |
| Change, 1 year | 10.7% | 11.8% |
| Change, 5 years | 22.0% | −81.4% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.00 | 1.25 |
| Employees | 6,000 | 14K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 20 (better) | 4 |
| Valuation score | 5 (better) | 2 |
| Growth score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Performance score | 6 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 6 (better) | 2 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 11.7× | – |
| P/S | 2.1× | 0.4× (better) |
| P/B | 5.1× | 1.5× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 7.6× | – |
| P/FCF | 11.2× | – |
| PEG | 0.40 | – |
| FCF yield | 8.9% (better) | −4.3% |
| Fair value | $148.10 | $6.06 |
| Margin of safety | 40.3% (better) | 17.4% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 6.3% (better) | −4.2% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 16.5% (better) | −1.2% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 4.4% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 11.7% | – |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 25.6% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 58.9% (better) | 46.7% |
| Operating margin | 23.6% (better) | −2.5% |
| Net margin | 19.0% (better) | −9.8% |
| FCF margin | 18.9% (better) | −1.9% |
| Return on equity | 44.3% (better) | −28.7% |
| Return on invested capital | 96.1% (better) | −4.4% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 0.40 (better) |
| Interest coverage | 280× (better) | −2.1× |
| Current ratio | 2.72 (better) | 1.95 |
| Altman Z-score | 8.15 (better) | 2.05 |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 (better) | 4 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | 10.6% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 10.6% (better) | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 100% | 92.2% |
| Held by insiders | 0.90% | 39.4% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$1.0M | $225M (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 8.3% | – |
Go deeper
- DECK stock overview
- DECK income statement
- DECK valuation and score
- UAA stock overview
- UAA income statement
- UAA valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.