Easterly Government Properties vs First Industrial Realty Trust
DEA and FR side by side, both in miscellaneous investing. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How DEA and FR compare
First Industrial Realty Trust is the larger company, worth 6.9 times as much as Easterly Government Properties ($7.3B against $1.1B).
On earnings, First Industrial Realty Trust is cheaper: it trades at 20.5× trailing earnings, against 77.0× for Easterly Government Properties.
Easterly Government Properties grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (11.4% versus 8.5% for First Industrial Realty Trust).
First Industrial Realty Trust keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 46.1% compared with 4.0% at Easterly Government Properties.
Both pay dividends: Easterly Government Properties yields 6.0% and First Industrial Realty Trust 3.5%.
First Industrial Realty Trust scores higher on the StockData Score (17 against 13 for Easterly Government Properties), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | DEA | FR |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $1.1B | $7.3B |
| Share price | $22.34 | $55.26 |
| Change, 1 year | 3.5% | −1.4% |
| Change, 5 years | −58.0% | −9.7% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.56 | 0.84 |
| Employees | 55 | 152 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 13 | 17 (better) |
| Valuation score | 2 | 3 (better) |
| Growth score | 3 | 4 (better) |
| Performance score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Health score | 4 | 4 |
| Dividend score | 3 | 3 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 77.0× | 20.5× (better) |
| P/S | 2.9× (better) | 9.4× |
| P/B | 0.8× (better) | 2.6× |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 13.3× |
| Fair value | $23.58 | $54.79 |
| Margin of safety | 5.3% (better) | −0.86% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 11.4% (better) | 8.5% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 6.5% | 10.2% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 4.6% | 50.9% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −6.5% | 50.3% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | −6.4% | 4.1% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 77.2% | – |
| Net margin | 4.0% | 46.1% (better) |
| Return on equity | 1.1% | 13.2% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Altman Z-score | 0.49 | 1.67 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 5 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 6.0% (better) | 3.5% |
| Payout ratio | 604% | 71.8% |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | 13 (better) |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | −5.0% | 12.2% (better) |
| Buyback yield | −2.0% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 4.0% (better) | 3.5% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 77.8% | 100% |
| Held by insiders | 13.6% | 0.37% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | – | −$39.7K |
| Short interest, % of float | 4.5% | 3.7% |
Go deeper
- DEA stock overview
- DEA income statement
- DEA valuation and score
- FR stock overview
- FR income statement
- FR valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.