First Industrial Realty Trust vs STAG Industrial
FR and STAG side by side, both in miscellaneous investing. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How FR and STAG compare
First Industrial Realty Trust and STAG Industrial are about the same size, with market caps of $7.3B and $7.1B.
On earnings, First Industrial Realty Trust is cheaper: it trades at 20.5× trailing earnings, against 26.2× for STAG Industrial.
STAG Industrial grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (9.3% versus 8.5% for First Industrial Realty Trust).
First Industrial Realty Trust keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 46.1% compared with 29.9% at STAG Industrial.
Both pay dividends: First Industrial Realty Trust yields 3.5% and STAG Industrial 3.8%.
First Industrial Realty Trust scores higher on the StockData Score (17 against 10 for STAG Industrial), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | FR | STAG |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $7.3B | $7.1B |
| Share price | $55.18 | $36.97 |
| Change, 1 year | −1.7% | −5.4% |
| Change, 5 years | −9.8% | −13.6% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.84 | 0.73 |
| Employees | 152 | 93 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 17 (better) | 10 |
| Valuation score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Growth score | 4 (better) | 2 |
| Performance score | 3 | 4 (better) |
| Health score | 4 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 20.5× (better) | 26.2× |
| P/S | 9.4× | 7.9× (better) |
| P/B | 2.6× | 2.0× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 13.2× | – |
| Fair value | $54.60 | $35.91 |
| Margin of safety | −1.1% (better) | −2.9% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 8.5% | 9.3% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 10.2% | 11.8% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 50.9% (better) | 11.7% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 50.3% (better) | 8.5% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 4.1% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Net margin | 46.1% (better) | 29.9% |
| Return on equity | 13.2% (better) | 7.6% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | – |
| Altman Z-score | 1.67 (better) | 1.05 |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 6 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 3.5% | 3.8% (better) |
| Payout ratio | 71.8% | 91.9% |
| Years of dividend growth | 13 (better) | 2 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 12.2% (better) | 0.68% |
| Shareholder yield | 3.5% | 3.8% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 100% | 93.8% |
| Held by insiders | 0.37% | 0.22% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$39.7K (better) | −$5.3M |
| Short interest, % of float | 3.7% | 3.9% |
Go deeper
- FR stock overview
- FR income statement
- FR valuation and score
- STAG stock overview
- STAG income statement
- STAG valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.