DANA vs Polaris
DAN and PII side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How DAN and PII compare
Polaris is the larger company, worth 1.4 times as much as DANA ($3.7B against $2.6B).
Polaris grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (9.5% versus 5.1% for DANA).
DANA keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 13.5% compared with −2.7% at Polaris.
Both pay dividends: DANA yields 1.5% and Polaris 4.2%.
DANA scores higher on the StockData Score (15 against 9 for Polaris), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | DAN | PII |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $2.6B | $3.7B |
| Share price | $23.90 | $64.43 |
| Change, 1 year | 9.9% | −2.3% |
| Change, 5 years | 1.2% | −46.2% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.45 | 1.09 |
| Employees | 27K | 15K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 15 (better) | 9 |
| Valuation score | 4 (better) | 1 |
| Growth score | 2 | 2 |
| Performance score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Dividend score | 3 | 4 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 2.5× | – |
| P/S | 0.3× (better) | 0.5× |
| P/B | 1.5× (better) | 4.3× |
| EV/EBITDA | 15.6× (better) | 39.5× |
| P/FCF | 29.6× | 13.8× (better) |
| FCF yield | 3.4% | 7.2% (better) |
| Fair value | $19.56 | $69.97 |
| Margin of safety | −22.2% | 7.9% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 5.1% | 9.5% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 1.1% | 2.6% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 1804% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 2022% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 9.8% | 21.3% (better) |
| Operating margin | 3.2% (better) | −1.8% |
| Net margin | 13.5% (better) | −2.7% |
| FCF margin | 1.1% | 3.5% (better) |
| Return on equity | 74.5% (better) | −20.7% |
| Return on invested capital | 3.6% (better) | −4.6% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.92 (better) | 1.93 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 5.04 (better) | 10.47 |
| Interest coverage | 2.2× (better) | −1.1× |
| Current ratio | 1.13 (better) | 1.06 |
| Altman Z-score | 2.14 (better) | 1.85 |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 (better) | 2 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 1.5% | 4.2% (better) |
| Payout ratio | 4.9% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | 16 (better) |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 32.0% (better) | 1.6% |
| Buyback yield | 22.6% (better) | 0.25% |
| Shareholder yield | 24.1% (better) | 4.5% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 99.8% | 89.8% |
| Held by insiders | 1.6% | 1.4% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $0 (better) | −$4.2M |
| Short interest, % of float | 4.1% | 9.6% |
Go deeper
- DAN stock overview
- DAN income statement
- DAN valuation and score
- PII stock overview
- PII income statement
- PII valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.