DANA vs Magna International
DAN and MGA side by side, both in motor vehicles and motor vehicle equipment. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How DAN and MGA compare
DANA grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (5.1% versus −1.9% for Magna International).
DANA keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 13.5% compared with 2.0% at Magna International.
DANA pays a dividend yielding 1.5%; Magna International does not pay one.
DANA scores higher on the StockData Score (15 against 8 for Magna International), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | DAN | MGA |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $2.6B | – |
| Share price | $23.90 | $61.82 |
| Change, 1 year | 9.9% | 22.7% |
| Change, 5 years | 1.2% | −27.9% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.45 | 1.11 |
| Employees | 27K | 125K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 15 (better) | 8 |
| Valuation score | 4 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 2 | 2 |
| Performance score | 3 | 3 |
| Health score | 3 | 3 |
| Dividend score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 2.5× | – |
| P/S | 0.3× | – |
| P/B | 1.5× | – |
| EV/EBITDA | 15.6× | – |
| P/FCF | 29.6× | – |
| FCF yield | 3.4% | – |
| Fair value | $19.56 | – |
| Margin of safety | −22.2% | – |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 5.1% (better) | −1.9% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 1.1% | 5.2% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 1804% (better) | −17.8% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 2022% (better) | −16.8% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 3.1% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 9.8% | 14.3% (better) |
| Operating margin | 3.2% | – |
| Net margin | 13.5% (better) | 2.0% |
| FCF margin | 1.1% | 5.4% (better) |
| Return on equity | 74.5% (better) | 6.9% |
| Return on invested capital | 3.6% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.92 | 0.38 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 5.04 | – |
| Interest coverage | 2.2× | – |
| Current ratio | 1.13 | 1.25 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 2.14 | – |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 | 7 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 1.5% | – |
| Payout ratio | 4.9% | 65.6% |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | 16 (better) |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 32.0% (better) | 3.9% |
| Buyback yield | 22.6% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 24.1% | – |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 99.8% | 63.9% |
| Held by insiders | 1.6% | 0.00% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $0 | – |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 4.1% | 3.3% |
Go deeper
- DAN stock overview
- DAN income statement
- DAN valuation and score
- MGA stock overview
- MGA income statement
- MGA valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.