CVR Energy vs PBF Energy
CVI and PBF side by side, both in petroleum refining. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How CVI and PBF compare
PBF Energy is the larger company, worth 2.1 times as much as CVR Energy ($8.6B against $4.1B).
On earnings, PBF Energy is cheaper: it trades at 3.2× trailing earnings, against 59.5× for CVR Energy.
PBF Energy grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (31.5% versus 17.9% for CVR Energy).
PBF Energy keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 7.0% compared with 0.81% at CVR Energy.
Both pay dividends: CVR Energy yields 0.49% and PBF Energy 1.6%.
PBF Energy scores higher on the StockData Score (19 against 5 for CVR Energy), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | CVI | PBF |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $4.1B | $8.6B |
| Share price | $41.06 | $70.96 |
| Change, 1 year | 10.7% | 76.3% |
| Change, 5 years | 157% | 456% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.74 | 0.38 |
| Employees | 1,532 | 3,678 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 5 | 19 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 6 (better) |
| Growth score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Performance score | 1 | 4 (better) |
| Health score | 2 | 6 (better) |
| Dividend score | 1 | 1 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 59.5× | 3.2× (better) |
| P/S | 0.5× | 0.2× (better) |
| P/B | 7.9× | 1.1× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 7.8× | 2.2× (better) |
| P/FCF | 11.8× | 3.3× (better) |
| FCF yield | 8.5% | 30.5% (better) |
| Fair value | $31.19 | $174.48 |
| Margin of safety | −31.6% | 59.3% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 17.9% | 31.5% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 12.8% | 14.2% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 6.1% | 8.9% (better) |
| Operating margin | 4.1% | 9.8% (better) |
| Net margin | 0.81% | 7.0% (better) |
| FCF margin | 4.1% | 6.8% (better) |
| Return on equity | 13.9% | 41.1% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 15.6% | 39.1% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 3.40 | 0.27 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 1.52 (better) | −0.11 |
| Interest coverage | – | 25.0× |
| Current ratio | 1.42 | 1.59 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 2.91 | 4.22 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 8 (better) | 4 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 0.49% | 1.6% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 0.49% | 1.6% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 103% | 86.4% |
| Held by insiders | – | 27.2% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $16.4M (better) | −$1.0B |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | – | 12.6% |
Go deeper
- CVI stock overview
- CVI income statement
- CVI valuation and score
- PBF stock overview
- PBF income statement
- PBF valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.