Cooper-Standard vs DANA
CPS and DAN side by side, both in motor vehicles and motor vehicle equipment. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How CPS and DAN compare
DANA is the larger company, worth 7.4 times as much as Cooper-Standard ($2.5B against $336M).
Cooper-Standard grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (27.9% versus 5.1% for DANA).
DANA keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 13.5% compared with −1.7% at Cooper-Standard.
DANA pays a dividend yielding 1.6%; Cooper-Standard does not pay one.
DANA scores higher on the StockData Score (15 against 5 for Cooper-Standard), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | CPS | DAN |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $336M | $2.5B |
| Share price | $18.93 | $23.19 |
| Change, 1 year | −34.4% | 8.4% |
| Change, 5 years | −21.8% | −1.8% |
| Beta (5Y) | 2.35 | 1.44 |
| Employees | 22K | 27K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 5 | 15 (better) |
| Valuation score | 1 | 4 (better) |
| Growth score | 2 | 2 |
| Performance score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Health score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 2.4× |
| P/S | 0.1× (better) | 0.3× |
| P/B | – | 1.5× |
| EV/EBITDA | 13.4× (better) | 15.3× |
| P/FCF | – | 28.7× |
| FCF yield | −8.4% | 3.5% (better) |
| Fair value | – | $19.85 |
| Margin of safety | – | −16.8% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 27.9% (better) | 5.1% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | – | 1.1% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 1804% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | 2022% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 12.0% (better) | 9.8% |
| Operating margin | 2.9% | 3.2% (better) |
| Net margin | −1.7% | 13.5% (better) |
| FCF margin | −0.81% | 1.1% (better) |
| Return on equity | – | 74.5% |
| Return on invested capital | 9.3% (better) | 3.6% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 0.92 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 10.21 | 5.04 (better) |
| Interest coverage | – | 2.2× |
| Current ratio | 1.31 (better) | 1.13 |
| Altman Z-score | 1.85 | 2.13 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | 7 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 1.6% |
| Payout ratio | – | 4.9% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 0 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 32.0% |
| Buyback yield | – | 23.2% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 24.8% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 64.9% | 99.8% |
| Held by insiders | 5.5% | 1.6% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $225K (better) | $0 |
| Short interest, % of float | 4.5% | 4.1% |
Go deeper
- CPS stock overview
- CPS income statement
- CPS valuation and score
- DAN stock overview
- DAN income statement
- DAN valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.