Capri vs Tapestry
CPRI and TPR side by side, both in consumer discretionary. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How CPRI and TPR compare
Tapestry is the larger company, worth 12 times as much as Capri ($26.4B against $2.2B).
On earnings, Capri is cheaper: it trades at 12.1× trailing earnings, against 17.0× for Tapestry.
Tapestry grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (13.7% versus −4.2% for Capri).
Tapestry keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 19.7% compared with 6.1% at Capri.
Tapestry pays a dividend yielding 1.3%; Capri does not pay one.
Tapestry scores higher on the StockData Score (19 against 8 for Capri), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | CPRI | TPR |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $2.2B | $26.4B |
| Share price | $21.46 | $132.41 |
| Change, 1 year | −2.8% | 27.3% |
| Change, 5 years | −65.7% | 188% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.37 | 1.08 |
| Employees | 11K | 21K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 8 | 19 (better) |
| Valuation score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Growth score | 1 | 5 (better) |
| Performance score | 2 | 6 (better) |
| Health score | 3 | 4 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 12.1× (better) | 17.0× |
| P/S | 0.7× (better) | 3.2× |
| P/B | 34.1× (better) | 76.7× |
| EV/EBITDA | 15.5× | 13.0× (better) |
| P/FCF | 12.1× (better) | 14.0× |
| PEG | – | 0.73 |
| FCF yield | 8.3% (better) | 7.1% |
| Fair value | $19.96 | $100.29 |
| Margin of safety | −7.5% (better) | −32.0% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −4.2% | 13.7% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | −3.1% | 6.9% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 494% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | 542% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 19.8% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 63.3% | 78.3% (better) |
| Operating margin | 1.4% | 24.5% (better) |
| Net margin | 6.1% | 19.7% (better) |
| FCF margin | 5.4% | 23.0% (better) |
| Return on equity | – | 434% |
| Return on invested capital | 4.4% | 74.3% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 7.38 (better) | 7.55 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 2.14 | 0.83 (better) |
| Interest coverage | – | 17.0× |
| Current ratio | 1.18 | 1.24 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 3.51 | 4.11 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 | 8 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 1.3% |
| Payout ratio | – | 20.8% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 1 |
| Buyback yield | 12.8% (better) | 5.5% |
| Shareholder yield | 12.8% (better) | 6.8% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 109% | 99.7% |
| Held by insiders | 2.8% | 0.56% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$1.3M (better) | −$54.4M |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 10.7% | 8.5% |
Go deeper
- CPRI stock overview
- CPRI income statement
- CPRI valuation and score
- TPR stock overview
- TPR income statement
- TPR valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.