Canadian Pacific Kansas City vs CSX
CP and CSX side by side, both in industrials. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How CP and CSX compare
Canadian Pacific Kansas City grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (6.5% versus 5.8% for CSX).
Canadian Pacific Kansas City keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 24.1% compared with 24.0% at CSX.
CSX pays a dividend yielding 1.0%; Canadian Pacific Kansas City does not pay one.
CSX scores higher on the StockData Score (9 against 6 for Canadian Pacific Kansas City), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | CP | CSX |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | – | $96.6B |
| Share price | $94.60 | $52.40 |
| Change, 1 year | 32.5% | 49.8% |
| Change, 5 years | 26.4% | 45.2% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.62 | 0.76 |
| Employees | 12K | 23K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 6 | 9 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 1 | 1 |
| Performance score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Health score | 2 | 2 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 27.2× |
| P/S | – | 6.5× |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 16.1× |
| P/FCF | – | 30.1× |
| FCF yield | – | 3.3% |
| Fair value | – | $37.35 |
| Margin of safety | – | −40.3% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 6.5% (better) | 5.8% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 14.4% (better) | 5.9% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −9.4% | 23.4% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −5.9% | 26.1% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 4.7% | 5.1% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Operating margin | 36.4% (better) | 36.4% |
| Net margin | 24.1% (better) | 24.0% |
| FCF margin | 18.4% | 21.5% (better) |
| Return on equity | 8.4% | – |
| Return on invested capital | 6.0% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.56 | – |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 3.22 | 2.43 (better) |
| Interest coverage | – | 6.4× |
| Current ratio | 0.52 | 0.84 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | – | 2.95 |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 5 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 1.0% |
| Payout ratio | 21.9% | 28.5% |
| Years of dividend growth | 1 | 6 (better) |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 4.2% | 8.2% (better) |
| Buyback yield | – | 1.2% |
| Shareholder yield | – | 2.3% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 71.1% | 79.9% |
| Held by insiders | 0.00% | 0.23% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | – | −$16.6M |
| Superinvestors holding | 4 (better) | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | – | 2.0% |
Go deeper
- CP stock overview
- CP income statement
- CP valuation and score
- CSX stock overview
- CSX income statement
- CSX valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.