Coty vs Haleon
COTY and HLN side by side, both in soap, detergents, and cleaning preparations; perfumes, cosmetics, and other toilet preparations. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How COTY and HLN compare
Coty grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (−0.24% versus −1.8% for Haleon).
Haleon keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 15.1% compared with −9.7% at Coty.
Haleon scores higher on the StockData Score (9 against 4 for Coty), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | COTY | HLN |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $3.5B | – |
| Share price | $4.03 | $9.09 |
| Change, 1 year | 12.9% | −7.7% |
| Change, 5 years | −61.1% | – |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.99 | 0.16 |
| Employees | 11K | – |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 4 | 9 (better) |
| Valuation score | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Performance score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Health score | 2 | 2 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/S | 0.6× | – |
| P/B | 1.1× | – |
| EV/EBITDA | 16.5× | – |
| P/FCF | 8.4× | – |
| FCF yield | 11.9% | – |
| Fair value | $4.69 | – |
| Margin of safety | 14.1% | – |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −0.24% (better) | −1.8% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 4.6% (better) | 2.2% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 15.6% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | 17.8% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 8.3% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 62.6% | 64.2% (better) |
| Operating margin | −1.7% | 21.9% (better) |
| Net margin | −9.7% | 15.1% (better) |
| FCF margin | 7.3% | 21.0% (better) |
| Return on equity | −16.7% | 10.2% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | −1.2% | 7.9% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.89 | 0.50 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 6.71 | 2.68 (better) |
| Interest coverage | −0.6× | 7.1× (better) |
| Current ratio | 0.75 (better) | 0.69 |
| Altman Z-score | −0.02 | – |
| Piotroski F-score | 3 | 7 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | – |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 44.1% | 6.7% |
| Held by insiders | 61.5% | 0.00% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $213K | – |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 11.7% | – |
Go deeper
- COTY stock overview
- COTY income statement
- COTY valuation and score
- HLN stock overview
- HLN income statement
- HLN valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.