Compass vs Jones Lang LaSalle
COMP and JLL side by side, both in real estate. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How COMP and JLL compare
Jones Lang LaSalle is the larger company, worth 2.2 times as much as Compass ($17.0B against $7.8B).
On earnings, Jones Lang LaSalle is cheaper: it trades at 16.1× trailing earnings, against 73.3× for Compass.
Compass grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (89.8% versus 11.4% for Jones Lang LaSalle).
Jones Lang LaSalle scores higher on the StockData Score (9 against 6 for Compass), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | COMP | JLL |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $7.8B | $17.0B |
| Share price | $10.26 | $372.14 |
| Change, 1 year | 16.7% | 24.1% |
| Change, 5 years | −1.6% | 43.0% |
| Beta (5Y) | 2.24 | 1.25 |
| Employees | 3,200 | 113K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 6 | 9 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Growth score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Performance score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Health score | 1 | 4 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 73.3× | 16.1× (better) |
| P/S | 0.6× | 0.6× (better) |
| P/B | 2.5× | 2.2× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 33.0× | 10.7× (better) |
| P/FCF | 26.4× | – |
| PEG | – | 2.20 |
| FCF yield | 3.8% | – |
| Fair value | $2.62 | $369.30 |
| Margin of safety | −292% | −0.77% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 89.8% (better) | 11.4% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 13.3% (better) | 9.5% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | 77.1% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 16.3% |
| Profitability | ||
| Operating margin | −1.4% | 4.9% (better) |
| Net margin | 1.1% | – |
| FCF margin | 2.3% | – |
| Return on equity | 6.8% | – |
| Return on invested capital | −4.8% | 15.1% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 1.00 | 0.09 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 7.53 | 0.13 (better) |
| Interest coverage | −1.5× | – |
| Current ratio | 1.12 | 1.12 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 1.86 | 3.43 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 8 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | – | 3.7% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 3.7% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 93.5% | 94.6% |
| Held by insiders | 6.8% | 1.0% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$2.5M (better) | −$12.9M |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 6.9% | 3.2% |
Go deeper
- COMP stock overview
- COMP income statement
- COMP valuation and score
- JLL stock overview
- JLL income statement
- JLL valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.