CBRE vs Jones Lang LaSalle
CBRE and JLL side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How CBRE and JLL compare
CBRE is the larger company, worth 2.3 times as much as Jones Lang LaSalle ($38.4B against $16.8B).
On earnings, Jones Lang LaSalle is cheaper: it trades at 15.9× trailing earnings, against 28.5× for CBRE.
CBRE grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (14.8% versus 11.4% for Jones Lang LaSalle).
CBRE scores higher on the StockData Score (11 against 10 for Jones Lang LaSalle), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | CBRE | JLL |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $38.4B | $16.8B |
| Share price | $133.12 | $366.83 |
| Change, 1 year | −14.3% | 19.4% |
| Change, 5 years | 33.5% | 41.0% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.02 | 1.25 |
| Employees | 155K | 113K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 11 (better) | 10 |
| Valuation score | 2 | 3 (better) |
| Growth score | 3 (better) | 1 |
| Performance score | 4 (better) | 2 |
| Health score | 2 | 4 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 28.5× | 15.9× (better) |
| P/S | 0.9× | 0.6× (better) |
| P/B | 4.4× | 2.2× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 15.4× | 10.6× (better) |
| P/FCF | 40.9× | – |
| PEG | – | 2.17 |
| FCF yield | 2.4% | – |
| Fair value | $95.03 | $368.49 |
| Margin of safety | −40.1% | 0.45% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 14.8% (better) | 11.4% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 11.2% (better) | 9.5% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 12.5% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 15.3% | 77.1% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 11.6% | 16.3% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 18.5% | – |
| Operating margin | 4.6% | 4.9% (better) |
| Net margin | 3.1% | – |
| FCF margin | 2.1% | – |
| Return on equity | 16.1% | – |
| Return on invested capital | 11.2% | 15.1% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.91 | 0.09 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 2.14 | 0.13 (better) |
| Current ratio | 1.17 (better) | 1.12 |
| Altman Z-score | 3.22 | 3.42 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 | 8 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | 3.8% (better) | 3.8% |
| Shareholder yield | 3.8% (better) | 3.8% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 98.7% | 94.6% |
| Held by insiders | 2.8% | 1.0% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$2.5M (better) | −$12.9M |
| Superinvestors holding | 4 (better) | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 1.5% | 3.2% |
Go deeper
- CBRE stock overview
- CBRE income statement
- CBRE valuation and score
- JLL stock overview
- JLL income statement
- JLL valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.