Americold Realty Trust vs Extra Space Storage
COLD and EXR side by side, both in miscellaneous investing. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How COLD and EXR compare
Extra Space Storage is the larger company, worth 7.2 times as much as Americold Realty Trust ($33.2B against $4.6B).
On earnings, Americold Realty Trust is cheaper: it trades at 19.5× trailing earnings, against 32.4× for Extra Space Storage.
Extra Space Storage grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (4.1% versus 1.3% for Americold Realty Trust).
Extra Space Storage keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 29.9% compared with 9.0% at Americold Realty Trust.
Both pay dividends: Americold Realty Trust yields 5.7% and Extra Space Storage 4.1%.
Extra Space Storage scores higher on the StockData Score (16 against 12 for Americold Realty Trust), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | COLD | EXR |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $4.6B | $33.2B |
| Share price | $16.18 | $159.21 |
| Change, 1 year | 43.3% | 22.0% |
| Change, 5 years | −49.7% | −21.2% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.72 | 0.83 |
| Employees | 13K | 8,393 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 12 | 16 (better) |
| Valuation score | 4 (better) | 1 |
| Growth score | 2 | 3 (better) |
| Performance score | 3 | 4 (better) |
| Health score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Dividend score | 3 | 4 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 19.5× (better) | 32.4× |
| P/S | 1.7× (better) | 9.6× |
| P/B | 1.5× (better) | 2.6× |
| EV/EBITDA | 5.8× (better) | 14.6× |
| P/FCF | – | 21.4× |
| FCF yield | −2.9% | 4.7% (better) |
| Fair value | $28.77 | $125.33 |
| Margin of safety | 43.8% (better) | −27.0% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 1.3% | 4.1% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 5.5% | 20.0% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 9.5% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | 5.8% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 4.3% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 32.2% | 73.0% (better) |
| Operating margin | 15.1% | 43.8% (better) |
| Net margin | 9.0% | 29.9% (better) |
| FCF margin | −5.1% | 44.7% (better) |
| Return on equity | 7.9% (better) | 7.9% |
| Return on invested capital | 13.2% (better) | 11.1% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 0.00 |
| Interest coverage | 2.4× | – |
| Altman Z-score | 0.67 | 1.51 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 | 5 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 5.7% (better) | 4.1% |
| Payout ratio | 111% | 132% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 0 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 12.5% |
| Buyback yield | – | 1.4% |
| Shareholder yield | 5.7% (better) | 5.5% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 109% | 101% |
| Held by insiders | 10.4% | 1.1% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$25.4K (better) | −$2.4M |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 11.4% | 2.4% |
Go deeper
- COLD stock overview
- COLD income statement
- COLD valuation and score
- EXR stock overview
- EXR income statement
- EXR valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.