Vita Coco vs Primo Brands
COCO and PRMB side by side, both in beverages. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How COCO and PRMB compare
Primo Brands is the larger company, worth 2.3 times as much as Vita Coco ($8.7B against $3.7B).
On earnings, Vita Coco is cheaper: it trades at 32.8× trailing earnings, against 42.9× for Primo Brands.
Vita Coco grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (26.0% versus 4.5% for Primo Brands).
Vita Coco keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 15.7% compared with 3.1% at Primo Brands.
Primo Brands pays a dividend yielding 1.9%; Vita Coco does not pay one.
Vita Coco scores higher on the StockData Score (21 against 8 for Primo Brands), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | COCO | PRMB |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $3.7B | $8.7B |
| Share price | $65.31 | $24.00 |
| Change, 1 year | 56.6% | 54.2% |
| Change, 5 years | 315% | 29.2% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.11 | 0.80 |
| Employees | 336 | 13K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 21 (better) | 8 |
| Valuation score | 3 (better) | 1 |
| Growth score | 6 (better) | 2 |
| Performance score | 6 (better) | 1 |
| Health score | 6 (better) | 1 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 32.8× (better) | 42.9× |
| P/S | 4.9× | 1.3× (better) |
| P/B | 8.7× | 2.9× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 23.0× | 11.3× (better) |
| P/FCF | 25.9× | 21.0× (better) |
| PEG | 0.32 | – |
| FCF yield | 3.9% | 4.8% (better) |
| Fair value | $66.64 | $23.64 |
| Margin of safety | 2.0% (better) | −1.5% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 26.0% (better) | 4.5% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 14.4% | – |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 74.2% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 73.0% | – |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 16.3% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 41.0% (better) | 29.4% |
| Operating margin | 19.9% (better) | 8.6% |
| Net margin | 15.7% (better) | 3.1% |
| FCF margin | 18.8% (better) | 6.1% |
| Return on equity | 32.0% (better) | 6.7% |
| Return on invested capital | 59.8% (better) | 5.1% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 1.69 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | 3.94 |
| Interest coverage | – | 1.8× |
| Current ratio | 2.48 (better) | 1.11 |
| Altman Z-score | 11.32 (better) | 1.24 |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 (better) | 4 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 1.9% |
| Payout ratio | – | 81.4% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 1 |
| Buyback yield | 1.7% | 2.1% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 1.7% | 4.0% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 86.8% | 110% |
| Held by insiders | 22.7% | 59.9% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$72.2M (better) | −$993M |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 2 |
| Short interest, % of float | 16.1% | 20.2% |
Go deeper
- COCO stock overview
- COCO income statement
- COCO valuation and score
- PRMB stock overview
- PRMB income statement
- PRMB valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.