Celestica vs TTM Technologies
CLS and TTMI side by side, both in electronic components and accessories. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How CLS and TTMI compare
Celestica grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (61.6% versus 37.6% for TTM Technologies).
TTM Technologies keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 7.0% compared with 6.8% at Celestica.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | CLS | TTMI |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | – | $7.8B |
| Share price | $240.34 | $74.08 |
| Change, 1 year | −28.2% | 5.1% |
| Change, 5 years | 2042% | 420% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.93 | 1.70 |
| Employees | – | 18K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 15 | 15 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Growth score | 5 (better) | 4 |
| Performance score | 6 (better) | 4 |
| Health score | 4 (better) | 3 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 29.5× |
| P/S | – | 2.0× |
| P/B | – | 3.8× |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 20.2× |
| P/FCF | – | 528× |
| PEG | – | 1.30 |
| FCF yield | – | 0.19% |
| Fair value | – | $78.49 |
| Margin of safety | – | 5.6% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 61.6% (better) | 37.6% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 16.6% (better) | 6.7% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 73.8% | 104% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 71.4% | 99.2% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 72.4% (better) | 0.12% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 11.5% | 22.2% (better) |
| Operating margin | 8.3% | 11.1% (better) |
| Net margin | 6.8% | 7.0% (better) |
| FCF margin | 3.0% (better) | 0.39% |
| Return on equity | 30.2% (better) | 14.3% |
| Return on invested capital | 46.2% (better) | 13.4% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.13 (better) | 0.80 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | −1.86 | 1.81 (better) |
| Interest coverage | 21.3× (better) | 9.2× |
| Current ratio | 1.61 | 1.67 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | – | 2.84 |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 | 7 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | – | 0.00% |
| Shareholder yield | – | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 62.9% | 92.6% |
| Held by insiders | 0.73% | 2.4% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$254M | −$31.3M (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 3.7% | 5.4% |
Go deeper
- CLS stock overview
- CLS income statement
- CLS valuation and score
- TTMI stock overview
- TTMI income statement
- TTMI valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.