Calumet vs PBF Energy
CLMT and PBF side by side, both in petroleum refining. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How CLMT and PBF compare
PBF Energy is the larger company, worth 2.7 times as much as Calumet ($8.5B against $3.2B).
PBF Energy grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (31.5% versus 28.4% for Calumet).
PBF Energy keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 7.0% compared with −3.7% at Calumet.
PBF Energy pays a dividend yielding 1.6%; Calumet does not pay one.
PBF Energy scores higher on the StockData Score (19 against 3 for Calumet), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | CLMT | PBF |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $3.2B | $8.5B |
| Share price | $35.89 | $69.73 |
| Change, 1 year | 87.4% | 75.1% |
| Change, 5 years | 152% | 446% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.87 | 0.38 |
| Employees | 1,540 | 3,678 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 3 | 19 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 6 (better) |
| Growth score | 2 | 2 |
| Performance score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Health score | 1 | 6 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 3.1× |
| P/S | 0.6× | 0.2× (better) |
| P/B | – | 1.1× |
| EV/EBITDA | 15.1× | 2.1× (better) |
| P/FCF | 11.9× | 3.2× (better) |
| FCF yield | 8.4% | 31.0% (better) |
| Fair value | – | $171.39 |
| Margin of safety | – | 59.3% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 28.4% | 31.5% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 12.8% | 14.2% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 9.1% (better) | 8.9% |
| Operating margin | 3.4% | 9.8% (better) |
| Net margin | −3.7% | 7.0% (better) |
| FCF margin | 5.1% | 6.8% (better) |
| Return on equity | – | 41.1% |
| Return on invested capital | 9.8% | 39.1% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 0.27 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 5.78 (better) | −0.11 |
| Interest coverage | 0.9× | 25.0× (better) |
| Current ratio | 1.06 | 1.59 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 1.68 | 4.21 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 (better) | 4 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 1.6% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 1.6% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 52.4% | 86.4% |
| Held by insiders | 20.5% | 27.2% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$20.7M (better) | −$1.0B |
| Short interest, % of float | 6.3% | 12.6% |
Go deeper
- CLMT stock overview
- CLMT income statement
- CLMT valuation and score
- PBF stock overview
- PBF income statement
- PBF valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.