StockData

Colliers International vs Forestar

CIGI and FOR side by side, both in real estate. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How CIGI and FOR compare

Colliers International grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (15.3% versus 11.8% for Forestar).

Forestar scores higher on the StockData Score (14 against 5 for Colliers International), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricCIGIFOR
Size and price
Market cap–$1.1B
Share price$90.01$22.30
Change, 1 year−40.8%−9.8%
Change, 5 years−38.0%7.0%
Beta (5Y)1.030.89
Employees–78
StockData Score
Total score514 (better)
Valuation score06 (better)
Growth score3 (better)1
Performance score03 (better)
Health score24 (better)
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/E–6.7×
P/S–0.7×
P/B–0.6×
EV/EBITDA–3.2×
P/FCF–4.0×
FCF yield–24.9%
Fair value–$38.06
Margin of safety–41.4%
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)15.3% (better)11.8%
Revenue growth, 5Y average14.8% (better)12.3%
Net income growth (TTM)–4.7%
EPS growth (TTM)−37.3%4.4% (better)
EPS growth, 5Y average10.6%21.2% (better)
Profitability
Gross margin40.0% (better)21.4%
Operating margin6.7%–
Net margin–9.9%
FCF margin4.5%16.4% (better)
Return on equity–9.6%
Return on invested capital9.8%–
Financial health
Debt / equity1.07 (better)0.00
Net debt / EBITDA2.24–
Current ratio1.10–
Altman Z-score–1.53
Piotroski F-score–2
Dividends and buybacks
Years of dividend growth0–
Dividend growth, 5Y average24.6%–
Shareholder yield–0.00%
Ownership
Held by institutions71.3%36.8%
Held by insiders6.4%0.33%
Insider net buying, 12 months–−$232K
Superinvestors holding2–
Short interest, % of float3.3%2.0%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.