Constellation Energy vs DTE Energy
CEG and DTE side by side, both in electric services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How CEG and DTE compare
Constellation Energy is the larger company, worth 3.4 times as much as DTE Energy ($100B against $29.1B).
On earnings, DTE Energy is cheaper: it trades at 22.1× trailing earnings, against 27.5× for Constellation Energy.
Constellation Energy grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (26.0% versus 15.9% for DTE Energy).
Constellation Energy keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 11.1% compared with 8.0% at DTE Energy.
Both pay dividends: Constellation Energy yields 0.59% and DTE Energy 3.3%.
Constellation Energy scores higher on the StockData Score (10 against 6 for DTE Energy), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | CEG | DTE |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $100B | $29.1B |
| Share price | $282.40 | $139.69 |
| Change, 1 year | −19.7% | 0.40% |
| Change, 5 years | 685% | 25.6% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.23 | 0.32 |
| Employees | 15K | 9,650 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 10 (better) | 6 |
| Valuation score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 1 | 1 |
| Performance score | 4 (better) | 2 |
| Health score | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend score | 2 | 3 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 27.5× | 22.1× (better) |
| P/S | 3.2× | 1.8× (better) |
| P/B | 3.1× | 2.4× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 15.1× | 13.8× (better) |
| P/FCF | 324× | – |
| PEG | – | 2.63 |
| FCF yield | 0.31% | – |
| Fair value | $252.07 | $138.84 |
| Margin of safety | −12.0% | −0.61% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 26.0% (better) | 15.9% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 7.7% (better) | 6.7% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 15.2% (better) | −8.7% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 6.9% (better) | −8.9% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | −0.14% |
| Profitability | ||
| Operating margin | 14.7% (better) | 13.3% |
| Net margin | 11.1% (better) | 8.0% |
| FCF margin | 0.99% | – |
| Return on equity | 15.3% (better) | 11.0% |
| Return on invested capital | 8.2% (better) | 5.8% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.77 (better) | 2.27 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 2.90 (better) | 6.70 |
| Interest coverage | 5.9× (better) | 1.9× |
| Current ratio | 1.46 (better) | 0.80 |
| Altman Z-score | 1.57 (better) | 0.93 |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | 6 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 0.59% | 3.3% (better) |
| Payout ratio | 15.9% | 68.6% |
| Years of dividend growth | 3 | 3 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 1.5% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.59% | 3.3% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 81.3% | 81.2% |
| Held by insiders | 0.28% | 0.44% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $418K (better) | −$822K |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 3.0% | – |
Go deeper
- CEG stock overview
- CEG income statement
- CEG valuation and score
- DTE stock overview
- DTE income statement
- DTE valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.