Constellation Energy vs Energy Co of Minas Gerais
CEG and CIG side by side, both in electric services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How CEG and CIG compare
Constellation Energy grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (26.0% versus 7.4% for Energy Co of Minas Gerais).
Energy Co of Minas Gerais keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 11.5% compared with 11.1% at Constellation Energy.
Constellation Energy pays a dividend yielding 0.60%; Energy Co of Minas Gerais does not pay one.
Constellation Energy scores higher on the StockData Score (10 against 7 for Energy Co of Minas Gerais), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | CEG | CIG |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $99.3B | – |
| Share price | $280.20 | $1.92 |
| Change, 1 year | −20.9% | −15.4% |
| Change, 5 years | 679% | 4.0% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.23 | 0.57 |
| Employees | 15K | 5,320 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 10 (better) | 7 |
| Valuation score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Performance score | 4 | 4 |
| Health score | 2 | 3 (better) |
| Dividend score | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 27.3× | – |
| P/S | 3.2× | – |
| P/B | 3.1× | – |
| EV/EBITDA | 15.0× | – |
| P/FCF | 321× | – |
| FCF yield | 0.31% | – |
| Fair value | $252.41 | – |
| Margin of safety | −11.0% | – |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 26.0% (better) | 7.4% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 7.7% | 11.1% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 15.2% (better) | −31.2% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 6.9% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | – | 16.9% |
| Operating margin | 14.7% | – |
| Net margin | 11.1% | 11.5% (better) |
| FCF margin | 0.99% | 7.9% (better) |
| Return on equity | 15.3% | 17.5% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 8.2% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.77 | 0.68 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 2.90 | 1.90 (better) |
| Interest coverage | 5.9× | – |
| Current ratio | 1.46 (better) | 1.00 |
| Altman Z-score | 1.56 | – |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 (better) | 3 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 0.60% | – |
| Payout ratio | 15.9% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 3 | – |
| Shareholder yield | 0.60% | – |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 81.3% | 5.1% |
| Held by insiders | 0.28% | 0.00% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $418K (better) | −$3.9K |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 3.0% | – |
Go deeper
- CEG stock overview
- CEG income statement
- CEG valuation and score
- CIG stock overview
- CIG income statement
- CIG valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.