Coeur Mining vs SSR Mining
CDE and SSRM side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How CDE and SSRM compare
Coeur Mining is the larger company, worth 2.7 times as much as SSR Mining ($15.4B against $5.7B).
On earnings, Coeur Mining is cheaper: it trades at 16.5× trailing earnings, against 25.5× for SSR Mining.
Coeur Mining grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (112% versus 48.4% for SSR Mining).
Coeur Mining keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 19.2% compared with 12.3% at SSR Mining.
Both pay dividends: Coeur Mining yields 0.13% and SSR Mining 0.11%.
SSR Mining scores higher on the StockData Score (21 against 17 for Coeur Mining), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | CDE | SSRM |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $15.4B | $5.7B |
| Share price | $15.03 | $28.07 |
| Change, 1 year | 1.1% | 34.8% |
| Change, 5 years | 135% | 44.2% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.55 | 0.71 |
| Employees | 2,620 | 2,900 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 17 | 21 (better) |
| Valuation score | 5 (better) | 3 |
| Growth score | 2 | 6 (better) |
| Performance score | 5 | 5 |
| Health score | 4 | 6 (better) |
| Dividend score | 1 | 1 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 16.5× (better) | 25.5× |
| P/S | 4.3× | 3.0× (better) |
| P/B | 1.5× (better) | 1.7× |
| EV/EBITDA | 8.1× | 4.3× (better) |
| P/FCF | 12.8× (better) | 16.3× |
| PEG | – | 0.92 |
| FCF yield | 7.8% (better) | 6.1% |
| Fair value | $22.29 | $29.77 |
| Margin of safety | 32.6% (better) | 5.7% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 112% (better) | 48.4% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 21.4% (better) | 13.8% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 69.5% (better) | 44.1% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 35.8% | 41.0% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 53.9% (better) | 14.0% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | – | 62.6% |
| Operating margin | 29.7% | 40.2% (better) |
| Net margin | 19.2% (better) | 12.3% |
| FCF margin | 33.5% (better) | 18.2% |
| Return on equity | 10.3% (better) | 7.1% |
| Return on invested capital | 11.5% | 28.1% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 (better) | 0.00 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | −0.67 | −2.04 |
| Interest coverage | – | 88.9× |
| Current ratio | 3.79 | 9.79 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 2.32 | 5.64 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 (better) | 6 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 0.13% (better) | 0.11% |
| Buyback yield | −0.01% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 0.12% (better) | 0.11% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 76.9% | 70.5% |
| Held by insiders | 0.93% | 1.0% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$1.8M | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 5.6% | – |
Go deeper
- CDE stock overview
- CDE income statement
- CDE valuation and score
- SSRM stock overview
- SSRM income statement
- SSRM valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.