Century Communities vs Toll Brothers
CCS and TOL side by side, both in operative builders. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How CCS and TOL compare
Toll Brothers is the larger company, worth 9.4 times as much as Century Communities ($13.6B against $1.5B).
On earnings, Toll Brothers is cheaper: it trades at 11.9× trailing earnings, against 13.7× for Century Communities.
Toll Brothers grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (−1.1% versus −8.2% for Century Communities).
Toll Brothers keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 11.1% compared with 2.9% at Century Communities.
Both pay dividends: Century Communities yields 2.4% and Toll Brothers 0.70%.
Toll Brothers scores higher on the StockData Score (16 against 9 for Century Communities), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | CCS | TOL |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $1.5B | $13.6B |
| Share price | $51.36 | $147.85 |
| Change, 1 year | −14.7% | 9.1% |
| Change, 5 years | −29.6% | 124% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.03 | 1.09 |
| Employees | 484 | 4,900 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 9 | 16 (better) |
| Valuation score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Growth score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Performance score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Health score | 4 | 5 (better) |
| Dividend score | 2 | 4 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 13.7× | 11.9× (better) |
| P/S | 0.4× (better) | 1.3× |
| P/B | 0.6× (better) | 1.6× |
| EV/EBITDA | 8.2× | 8.0× (better) |
| P/FCF | – | 12.5× |
| PEG | – | 1.61 |
| FCF yield | −6.0% | 8.0% (better) |
| Fair value | $43.33 | $127.40 |
| Margin of safety | −18.5% | −16.1% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −8.2% | −1.1% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 5.4% | 9.2% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −49.1% | −12.9% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −45.3% | −8.4% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | −4.5% | 31.7% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | – | 23.7% |
| Operating margin | – | 13.8% |
| Net margin | 2.9% | 11.1% (better) |
| FCF margin | −2.3% | 10.1% (better) |
| Return on equity | 4.2% | 14.4% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | – | 16.0% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Altman Z-score | 1.84 | 3.28 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 (better) | 4 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 2.4% (better) | 0.70% |
| Payout ratio | 32.9% | 8.1% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 5 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 17.4% |
| Buyback yield | 6.3% (better) | 5.0% |
| Shareholder yield | 8.7% (better) | 5.7% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 93.2% | 94.0% |
| Held by insiders | 15.2% | 0.74% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$7.3M (better) | −$26.1M |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 3 |
| Short interest, % of float | 8.4% | 4.4% |
Go deeper
- CCS stock overview
- CCS income statement
- CCS valuation and score
- TOL stock overview
- TOL income statement
- TOL valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.