Century Communities vs Hovnanian Enterprises
CCS and HOV side by side, both in operative builders. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How CCS and HOV compare
Century Communities is the larger company, worth 2.6 times as much as Hovnanian Enterprises ($1.5B against $561M).
On earnings, Century Communities is cheaper: it trades at 13.7× trailing earnings, against 106× for Hovnanian Enterprises.
Century Communities grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (−8.2% versus −10.1% for Hovnanian Enterprises).
Century Communities pays a dividend yielding 2.4%; Hovnanian Enterprises does not pay one.
Century Communities scores higher on the StockData Score (9 against 6 for Hovnanian Enterprises), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | CCS | HOV |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $1.5B | $561M |
| Share price | $51.36 | $94.19 |
| Change, 1 year | −14.7% | −24.5% |
| Change, 5 years | −29.6% | 2.8% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.03 | 2.08 |
| Employees | 484 | 1,891 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 9 (better) | 6 |
| Valuation score | 2 | 2 |
| Growth score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Performance score | 0 | 0 |
| Health score | 4 | 4 |
| Dividend score | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 13.7× (better) | 106× |
| P/S | 0.4× | 0.2× (better) |
| P/B | 0.6× (better) | 0.7× |
| EV/EBITDA | 8.2× (better) | 14.8× |
| P/FCF | – | 2.8× |
| FCF yield | −6.0% | 35.2% (better) |
| Fair value | $43.33 | $103.42 |
| Margin of safety | −18.5% | 8.9% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −8.2% (better) | −10.1% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 5.4% (better) | 4.9% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −49.1% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −45.3% (better) | −95.7% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | −4.5% | 1.1% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Net margin | 2.9% | – |
| FCF margin | −2.3% | 7.0% (better) |
| Return on equity | 4.2% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Altman Z-score | 1.84 (better) | 1.22 |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | – |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 2.4% | – |
| Payout ratio | 32.9% | – |
| Buyback yield | 6.3% (better) | 3.3% |
| Shareholder yield | 8.7% (better) | 3.3% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 93.2% | 56.1% |
| Held by insiders | 15.2% | 25.8% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$7.3M | −$1.8M (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 8.4% | – |
Go deeper
- CCS stock overview
- CCS income statement
- CCS valuation and score
- HOV stock overview
- HOV income statement
- HOV valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.