Century Communities vs Dream Finders Homes
CCS and DFH side by side, both in operative builders. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How CCS and DFH compare
Century Communities is the larger company, worth 1.5 times as much as Dream Finders Homes ($1.5B against $1.0B).
On earnings, Dream Finders Homes is cheaper: it trades at 11.8× trailing earnings, against 13.8× for Century Communities.
Century Communities grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (−8.2% versus −10.9% for Dream Finders Homes).
Century Communities keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 2.9% compared with 2.6% at Dream Finders Homes.
Century Communities pays a dividend yielding 2.4%; Dream Finders Homes does not pay one.
Dream Finders Homes scores higher on the StockData Score (10 against 8 for Century Communities), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | CCS | DFH |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $1.5B | $1.0B |
| Share price | $51.92 | $11.01 |
| Change, 1 year | −13.1% | −41.7% |
| Change, 5 years | −28.8% | −38.6% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.02 | 1.25 |
| Employees | 484 | 1,911 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 8 | 10 (better) |
| Valuation score | 1 | 5 (better) |
| Growth score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Performance score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Health score | 4 | 4 |
| Dividend score | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 13.8× | 11.8× (better) |
| P/S | 0.4× | 0.2× (better) |
| P/B | 0.6× (better) | 0.7× |
| EV/EBITDA | 8.3× | 4.6× (better) |
| FCF yield | −5.9% (better) | −18.3% |
| Fair value | $43.39 | $13.77 |
| Margin of safety | −19.7% | 20.0% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −8.2% (better) | −10.9% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 5.4% | 30.7% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −49.1% (better) | −63.0% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −45.3% (better) | −67.0% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | −4.5% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Net margin | 2.9% (better) | 2.6% |
| FCF margin | −2.3% (better) | −4.4% |
| Return on equity | 4.2% | 7.6% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Altman Z-score | 1.85 (better) | 1.63 |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 (better) | 2 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 2.4% | – |
| Payout ratio | 32.9% | – |
| Buyback yield | 6.2% (better) | 4.8% |
| Shareholder yield | 8.6% (better) | 4.8% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 93.2% | 33.8% |
| Held by insiders | 15.2% | 71.6% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$7.3M (better) | −$8.8M |
| Short interest, % of float | 8.4% | 38.0% |
Go deeper
- CCS stock overview
- CCS income statement
- CCS valuation and score
- DFH stock overview
- DFH income statement
- DFH valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.