StockData

CAVA vs Noodles

CAVA and NDLS side by side, both in eating and drinking places. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How CAVA and NDLS compare

CAVA is the larger company, worth 82 times as much as Noodles ($7.0B against $84.7M).

CAVA grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (27.0% versus 0.19% for Noodles).

CAVA keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 4.5% compared with −4.7% at Noodles.

CAVA scores higher on the StockData Score (13 against 2 for Noodles), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricCAVANDLS
Size and price
Market cap$7.0B$84.7M
Share price$59.80$14.20
Change, 1 year20.4%152%
Change, 5 years–−84.6%
Beta (5Y)1.781.09
Employees13K6,500
StockData Score
Total score13 (better)2
Valuation score11
Growth score3 (better)1
Performance score3 (better)0
Health score6 (better)0
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/E111×–
P/S4.9×0.2× (better)
P/B8.1×–
EV/EBITDA42.9×15.8× (better)
P/FCF175×22.5× (better)
FCF yield0.57%4.4% (better)
Fair value$30.10–
Margin of safety−98.6%–
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)27.0% (better)0.19%
Revenue growth, 5Y average–4.7%
Net income growth (TTM)−52.9%–
EPS growth (TTM)−53.4%–
Profitability
Gross margin24.4%–
Operating margin4.9% (better)−2.6%
Net margin4.5% (better)−4.7%
FCF margin2.8% (better)0.76%
Return on equity7.9%–
Return on invested capital10.1% (better)−16.1%
Financial health
Debt / equity0.00–
Net debt / EBITDA–8.65
Interest coverage–−1.2×
Current ratio2.44 (better)0.29
Altman Z-score7.35 (better)0.48
Piotroski F-score5 (better)3
Dividends and buybacks
Shareholder yield0.00%0.00%
Ownership
Held by institutions89.4%47.9%
Held by insiders66.7%–
Insider net buying, 12 months−$285M–
Short interest, % of float40.6%–

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.