Conagra Brands vs Nomad Foods
CAG and NOMD side by side, both in food and kindred products. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How CAG and NOMD compare
Conagra Brands grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (−1.8% versus −3.4% for Nomad Foods).
Nomad Foods keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 4.2% compared with −17.0% at Conagra Brands.
Conagra Brands pays a dividend yielding 5.9%; Nomad Foods does not pay one.
Conagra Brands scores higher on the StockData Score (10 against 4 for Nomad Foods), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | CAG | NOMD |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $7.0B | – |
| Share price | $14.73 | $11.92 |
| Change, 1 year | −15.1% | −1.7% |
| Change, 5 years | −52.1% | −50.3% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.13 | 0.35 |
| Employees | 17K | 7,752 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 10 (better) | 4 |
| Valuation score | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 1 | 1 |
| Performance score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Health score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Dividend score | 5 (better) | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/S | 0.6× | – |
| P/FCF | 8.0× | – |
| FCF yield | 12.5% | – |
| Fair value | $29.75 | – |
| Margin of safety | 50.5% | – |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −1.8% (better) | −3.4% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 0.17% | 3.8% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −324% | −41.2% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −326% | – |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | −4.4% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 23.8% | 26.9% (better) |
| Operating margin | −15.2% | 10.4% (better) |
| Net margin | −17.0% | 4.2% (better) |
| FCF margin | 7.8% | 8.5% (better) |
| Return on equity | – | 4.9% |
| Return on invested capital | – | 6.2% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 0.92 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | 5.52 |
| Interest coverage | – | 1.6× |
| Current ratio | 1.10 | 1.10 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 1.05 | – |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 | 4 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 5.9% | – |
| Payout ratio | – | 67.4% |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | – |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 6.2% | – |
| Buyback yield | 0.63% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 6.6% | – |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 88.9% | 61.4% |
| Held by insiders | 0.78% | 20.3% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $1.1M | $10.2M (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 9.4% | – |
Go deeper
- CAG stock overview
- CAG income statement
- CAG valuation and score
- NOMD stock overview
- NOMD income statement
- NOMD valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.