BlueLinx vs Trex
BXC and TREX side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How BXC and TREX compare
Trex is the larger company, worth 11 times as much as BlueLinx ($5.4B against $496M).
Trex grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (8.6% versus 2.1% for BlueLinx).
Trex keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 13.9% compared with −0.06% at BlueLinx.
Trex scores higher on the StockData Score (13 against 7 for BlueLinx), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | BXC | TREX |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $496M | $5.4B |
| Share price | $63.07 | $52.76 |
| Change, 1 year | 9.2% | 59.6% |
| Change, 5 years | −14.4% | −60.7% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.50 | 1.52 |
| Employees | 2,160 | 1,839 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 7 | 13 (better) |
| Valuation score | 3 (better) | 1 |
| Growth score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Performance score | 0 | 5 (better) |
| Health score | 4 | 6 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 30.7× |
| P/S | 0.2× (better) | 4.2× |
| P/B | 0.8× (better) | 5.3× |
| EV/EBITDA | 6.0× (better) | 16.7× |
| P/FCF | 8.5× (better) | 26.7× |
| PEG | – | 11.98 |
| FCF yield | 11.7% (better) | 3.7% |
| Fair value | $102.54 | $46.68 |
| Margin of safety | 38.5% (better) | −13.0% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 2.1% | 8.6% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | −0.94% | 5.9% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −107% | −15.2% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −107% | −11.8% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | −70.2% | 3.3% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 15.8% | 37.1% (better) |
| Operating margin | 1.2% | 19.2% (better) |
| Net margin | −0.06% | 13.9% (better) |
| FCF margin | 1.9% | 15.7% (better) |
| Return on equity | −0.31% | 17.3% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 4.8% | 17.7% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.48 (better) | 0.00 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | −0.27 | – |
| Interest coverage | 0.7× | – |
| Current ratio | 4.01 (better) | 1.23 |
| Altman Z-score | 3.31 | 8.94 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 | 6 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | 1.6% | 4.8% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 1.6% | 4.8% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 93.8% | 110% |
| Held by insiders | 2.1% | 0.92% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$2.9M | $138K (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 5.9% | 9.4% |
Go deeper
- BXC stock overview
- BXC income statement
- BXC valuation and score
- TREX stock overview
- TREX income statement
- TREX valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.