BWX Technologies vs Nordson
BWXT and NDSN side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How BWXT and NDSN compare
Nordson is the larger company, worth 1.6 times as much as BWX Technologies ($18.1B against $11.3B).
On earnings, BWX Technologies is cheaper: it trades at 30.1× trailing earnings, against 32.8× for Nordson.
BWX Technologies grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (17.7% versus 7.0% for Nordson).
Nordson keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 18.6% compared with 10.4% at BWX Technologies.
Both pay dividends: BWX Technologies yields 0.86% and Nordson 1.0%.
BWX Technologies scores higher on the StockData Score (19 against 18 for Nordson), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | BWXT | NDSN |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $11.3B | $18.1B |
| Share price | $122.97 | $324.74 |
| Change, 1 year | −37.5% | 37.5% |
| Change, 5 years | 139% | 21.6% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.83 | 1.02 |
| Employees | 1,300 | 8,000 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 19 (better) | 18 |
| Valuation score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 5 (better) | 3 |
| Performance score | 5 | 6 (better) |
| Health score | 4 | 5 (better) |
| Dividend score | 4 | 4 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 30.1× (better) | 32.8× |
| P/S | 3.1× (better) | 6.1× |
| P/B | 7.9× | 5.5× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 22.4× (better) | 22.5× |
| P/FCF | 30.3× | 25.0× (better) |
| PEG | 2.68 | – |
| FCF yield | 3.3% | 4.0% (better) |
| Fair value | $100.13 | $242.13 |
| Margin of safety | −22.8% (better) | −34.1% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 17.7% (better) | 7.0% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 8.5% (better) | 5.6% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 22.1% (better) | 22.0% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 22.5% | 24.2% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 4.2% | 14.8% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 22.6% | 55.3% (better) |
| Operating margin | 12.4% | 26.9% (better) |
| Net margin | 10.4% | 18.6% (better) |
| FCF margin | 10.3% | 24.3% (better) |
| Return on equity | 28.2% (better) | 17.8% |
| Return on invested capital | 13.3% | 13.4% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 1.43 | 0.53 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 2.56 | 1.84 (better) |
| Interest coverage | 17.4× (better) | 8.8× |
| Current ratio | 1.88 (better) | 1.82 |
| Altman Z-score | 4.11 | 6.26 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 (better) | 5 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 0.86% | 1.0% (better) |
| Payout ratio | 26.1% | 33.0% |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | 16 (better) |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 4.8% | 15.6% (better) |
| Buyback yield | 0.00% | 1.1% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 0.86% | 2.1% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 92.4% | 76.5% |
| Held by insiders | 0.38% | 0.55% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$7.0M (better) | −$23.5M |
| Short interest, % of float | 4.0% | 2.2% |
Go deeper
- BWXT stock overview
- BWXT income statement
- BWXT valuation and score
- NDSN stock overview
- NDSN income statement
- NDSN valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.