BellRing Brands vs Simply Good Foods
BRBR and SMPL side by side, both in food and kindred products. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How BRBR and SMPL compare
BellRing Brands and Simply Good Foods are about the same size, with market caps of $1.2B and $1.1B.
BellRing Brands grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (5.9% versus −6.5% for Simply Good Foods).
BellRing Brands keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 7.3% compared with −11.5% at Simply Good Foods.
BellRing Brands scores higher on the StockData Score (16 against 9 for Simply Good Foods), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | BRBR | SMPL |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $1.2B | $1.1B |
| Share price | $10.24 | $12.65 |
| Change, 1 year | −63.0% | −33.6% |
| Change, 5 years | −55.7% | −67.6% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.64 | 0.45 |
| Employees | 530 | 282 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 16 (better) | 9 |
| Valuation score | 6 (better) | 3 |
| Growth score | 4 (better) | 1 |
| Performance score | 3 (better) | 1 |
| Health score | 3 | 4 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 7.2× | – |
| P/S | 0.5× (better) | 0.8× |
| P/B | – | 0.8× |
| EV/EBITDA | 6.9× | – |
| P/FCF | 5.3× (better) | 7.0× |
| PEG | 0.30 | – |
| FCF yield | 18.9% (better) | 14.3% |
| Fair value | $35.22 | $28.39 |
| Margin of safety | 70.9% (better) | 55.4% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 5.9% (better) | −6.5% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 18.6% (better) | 6.2% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −24.9% (better) | −250% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −18.9% (better) | −266% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 22.9% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 28.6% | 32.6% (better) |
| Operating margin | 13.3% (better) | −13.2% |
| Net margin | 7.3% (better) | −11.5% |
| FCF margin | 9.6% | 11.6% (better) |
| Return on equity | – | −9.6% |
| Return on invested capital | 36.4% (better) | −7.8% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 0.24 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 3.27 | – |
| Interest coverage | – | −8.4× |
| Current ratio | 2.25 | 5.57 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 4.69 (better) | 2.01 |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 | 4 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | 28.9% (better) | 19.4% |
| Shareholder yield | 28.9% (better) | 19.4% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 114% | 99.0% |
| Held by insiders | 1.5% | 10.0% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$30.3K | $1.1M (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 12.9% | 12.7% |
Go deeper
- BRBR stock overview
- BRBR income statement
- BRBR valuation and score
- SMPL stock overview
- SMPL income statement
- SMPL valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.