Broadridge Financial Solutions vs RB Global
BR and RBA side by side, both in miscellaneous business services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How BR and RBA compare
Broadridge Financial Solutions is the larger company, worth 1.3 times as much as RB Global ($21.8B against $17.5B).
On earnings, Broadridge Financial Solutions is cheaper: it trades at 19.9× trailing earnings, against 36.3× for RB Global.
RB Global grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (11.1% versus 8.5% for Broadridge Financial Solutions).
Broadridge Financial Solutions keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 15.0% compared with 10.5% at RB Global.
Both pay dividends: Broadridge Financial Solutions yields 2.1% and RB Global 0.68%.
Broadridge Financial Solutions scores higher on the StockData Score (22 against 13 for RB Global), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | BR | RBA |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $21.8B | $17.5B |
| Share price | $191.47 | $94.26 |
| Change, 1 year | −14.1% | −6.2% |
| Change, 5 years | 10.0% | 29.6% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.81 | 0.50 |
| Employees | 16K | 8,000 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 22 (better) | 13 |
| Valuation score | 4 (better) | 2 |
| Growth score | 3 | 4 (better) |
| Performance score | 6 (better) | 3 |
| Health score | 5 (better) | 3 |
| Dividend score | 4 (better) | 1 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 19.9× (better) | 36.3× |
| P/S | 2.9× (better) | 3.5× |
| P/B | 7.7× | 3.3× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 17.2× | 14.9× (better) |
| P/FCF | 17.1× (better) | 28.2× |
| PEG | 0.91 | – |
| FCF yield | 5.9% (better) | 3.5% |
| Fair value | $233.23 | $92.43 |
| Margin of safety | 17.9% (better) | −2.0% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 8.5% | 11.1% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 8.4% | 27.2% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 33.9% (better) | 21.0% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 35.2% (better) | 24.4% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 15.6% (better) | 5.8% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 31.8% | – |
| Operating margin | 17.4% (better) | 16.6% |
| Net margin | 15.0% (better) | 10.5% |
| FCF margin | 17.1% (better) | 12.3% |
| Return on equity | 40.9% (better) | 9.8% |
| Return on invested capital | 18.6% (better) | 8.5% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 1.15 | 0.60 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 1.98 | 1.97 (better) |
| Interest coverage | 11.6× (better) | 4.6× |
| Current ratio | 1.24 | 1.31 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 4.22 (better) | 2.40 |
| Piotroski F-score | 8 (better) | 6 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 2.1% (better) | 0.68% |
| Payout ratio | 39.4% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 17 | – |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 11.1% | – |
| Buyback yield | 2.8% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 4.9% (better) | 0.68% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 94.5% | 98.3% |
| Held by insiders | 0.43% | 0.26% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$2.1M (better) | −$2.2M |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 3.1% | 9.9% |
Go deeper
- BR stock overview
- BR income statement
- BR valuation and score
- RBA stock overview
- RBA income statement
- RBA valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.