Broadstone Net Lease vs CBL & Associates Properties
BNL and CBL side by side, both in miscellaneous investing. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How BNL and CBL compare
Broadstone Net Lease is the larger company, worth 2.0 times as much as CBL & Associates Properties ($3.4B against $1.7B).
On earnings, CBL & Associates Properties is cheaper: it trades at 11.2× trailing earnings, against 23.2× for Broadstone Net Lease.
Broadstone Net Lease grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (8.0% versus 7.9% for CBL & Associates Properties).
Broadstone Net Lease keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 30.3% compared with 25.7% at CBL & Associates Properties.
Both pay dividends: Broadstone Net Lease yields 6.6% and CBL & Associates Properties 3.9%.
Broadstone Net Lease scores higher on the StockData Score (15 against 11 for CBL & Associates Properties), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | BNL | CBL |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $3.4B | $1.7B |
| Share price | $17.60 | $54.61 |
| Change, 1 year | −2.8% | 66.6% |
| Change, 5 years | −32.1% | 78.9% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.57 | 0.82 |
| Employees | 62 | 500 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 15 (better) | 11 |
| Valuation score | 4 (better) | 3 |
| Growth score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Performance score | 4 (better) | 3 |
| Health score | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend score | 4 (better) | 3 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 23.2× | 11.2× (better) |
| P/S | 7.0× | 2.8× (better) |
| P/B | 1.2× (better) | 4.0× |
| P/FCF | 12.9× | – |
| FCF yield | 7.8% | – |
| Fair value | $18.32 | $114.60 |
| Margin of safety | 3.9% | 52.3% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 8.0% (better) | 7.9% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 7.1% (better) | 0.09% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 63.1% (better) | 23.0% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 65.2% (better) | 23.2% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 2.6% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Net margin | 30.3% (better) | 25.7% |
| FCF margin | 54.3% | – |
| Return on equity | 5.1% | 39.7% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 4.69 |
| Altman Z-score | 0.74 (better) | 0.54 |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 6 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 6.6% (better) | 3.9% |
| Payout ratio | 152% | 46.7% |
| Years of dividend growth | 2 | – |
| Buyback yield | – | 0.90% |
| Shareholder yield | 6.6% (better) | 4.8% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 98.1% | 79.6% |
| Held by insiders | 1.2% | 15.3% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $212K (better) | −$123M |
| Short interest, % of float | 10.8% | 3.7% |
Go deeper
- BNL stock overview
- BNL income statement
- BNL valuation and score
- CBL stock overview
- CBL income statement
- CBL valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.