Builders FirstSource vs Lowes Companies
BLDR and LOW side by side, both in consumer discretionary. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How BLDR and LOW compare
Lowes Companies is the larger company, worth 20 times as much as Builders FirstSource ($128B against $6.5B).
On earnings, Lowes Companies is cheaper: it trades at 19.3× trailing earnings, against 164× for Builders FirstSource.
Lowes Companies grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (8.2% versus −8.3% for Builders FirstSource).
Lowes Companies keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 7.3% compared with 0.28% at Builders FirstSource.
Lowes Companies pays a dividend yielding 1.6%; Builders FirstSource does not pay one.
Lowes Companies scores higher on the StockData Score (13 against 5 for Builders FirstSource), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | BLDR | LOW |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $6.5B | $128B |
| Share price | $60.68 | $227.73 |
| Change, 1 year | −43.0% | −3.0% |
| Change, 5 years | −13.6% | −8.7% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.31 | 0.90 |
| Employees | 28K | 167K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 5 | 13 (better) |
| Valuation score | 2 | 2 |
| Growth score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Performance score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Health score | 2 | 3 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 164× | 19.3× (better) |
| P/S | 0.5× (better) | 1.4× |
| P/B | 1.6× | – |
| EV/EBITDA | 12.3× (better) | 12.8× |
| P/FCF | 26.0× | 18.3× (better) |
| PEG | – | 3.68 |
| FCF yield | 3.8% | 5.5% (better) |
| Fair value | $71.46 | $197.73 |
| Margin of safety | 15.1% (better) | −15.2% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −8.3% | 8.2% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 12.2% (better) | −0.75% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −93.2% | −3.1% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −93.0% | −2.8% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 7.9% | 8.9% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 28.5% | 33.1% (better) |
| Operating margin | 2.1% | 11.4% (better) |
| Net margin | 0.28% | 7.3% (better) |
| FCF margin | 1.7% | 7.7% (better) |
| Return on equity | 0.97% | – |
| Return on invested capital | 3.6% | 34.8% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 1.13 | – |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 5.05 | 2.71 (better) |
| Current ratio | 1.85 (better) | 1.10 |
| Altman Z-score | 2.06 | 3.28 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 6 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 1.6% |
| Payout ratio | – | 40.5% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 17 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 15.6% |
| Buyback yield | 4.6% (better) | 0.36% |
| Shareholder yield | 4.6% (better) | 2.0% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 100% | 79.0% |
| Held by insiders | 16.5% | 0.11% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $4.0M (better) | −$13.2M |
| Superinvestors holding | 6 (better) | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 9.8% | 2.0% |
Go deeper
- BLDR stock overview
- BLDR income statement
- BLDR valuation and score
- LOW stock overview
- LOW income statement
- LOW valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.