Benchmark Electronics vs TTM Technologies
BHE and TTMI side by side, both in electronic components and accessories. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How BHE and TTMI compare
TTM Technologies is the larger company, worth 3.5 times as much as Benchmark Electronics ($7.8B against $2.3B).
On earnings, TTM Technologies is cheaper: it trades at 29.5× trailing earnings, against 40.7× for Benchmark Electronics.
TTM Technologies grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (37.6% versus 12.9% for Benchmark Electronics).
TTM Technologies keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 7.0% compared with 1.9% at Benchmark Electronics.
Benchmark Electronics pays a dividend yielding 1.1%; TTM Technologies does not pay one.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | BHE | TTMI |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $2.3B | $7.8B |
| Share price | $63.03 | $74.08 |
| Change, 1 year | 39.3% | 5.1% |
| Change, 5 years | 142% | 420% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.01 | 1.70 |
| Employees | 12K | 18K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 15 | 15 |
| Valuation score | 1 | 4 (better) |
| Growth score | 3 | 4 (better) |
| Performance score | 2 | 4 (better) |
| Health score | 6 (better) | 3 |
| Dividend score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 40.7× | 29.5× (better) |
| P/S | 0.8× (better) | 2.0× |
| P/B | 2.0× (better) | 3.8× |
| EV/EBITDA | 14.0× (better) | 20.2× |
| P/FCF | 19.4× (better) | 528× |
| PEG | – | 1.30 |
| FCF yield | 5.2% (better) | 0.19% |
| Fair value | $52.66 | $78.49 |
| Margin of safety | −19.7% | 5.6% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 12.9% | 37.6% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 5.3% | 6.7% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 59.6% | 104% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 63.2% | 99.2% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 12.3% (better) | 0.12% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 10.4% | 22.2% (better) |
| Operating margin | 3.5% | 11.1% (better) |
| Net margin | 1.9% | 7.0% (better) |
| FCF margin | 3.9% (better) | 0.39% |
| Return on equity | 5.0% | 14.3% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 6.3% | 13.4% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.14 (better) | 0.80 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | −0.88 | 1.81 (better) |
| Interest coverage | 6.9× | 9.2× (better) |
| Current ratio | 1.87 (better) | 1.67 |
| Altman Z-score | 3.32 (better) | 2.84 |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | 7 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 1.1% | – |
| Payout ratio | 43.4% | – |
| Buyback yield | 0.67% (better) | 0.00% |
| Shareholder yield | 1.7% (better) | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 104% | 92.6% |
| Held by insiders | 2.8% | 2.4% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$12.5M (better) | −$31.3M |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 3 |
| Short interest, % of float | 6.0% | 5.4% |
Go deeper
- BHE stock overview
- BHE income statement
- BHE valuation and score
- TTMI stock overview
- TTMI income statement
- TTMI valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.