B&G Foods vs Campbell'S
BGS and CPB side by side, both in food and kindred products. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How BGS and CPB compare
Campbell'S is the larger company, worth 24 times as much as B&G Foods ($6.8B against $284M).
B&G Foods grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (−2.7% versus −5.0% for Campbell'S).
Campbell'S keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 4.1% compared with −4.7% at B&G Foods.
Both pay dividends: B&G Foods yields 16.3% and Campbell'S 6.2%.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | BGS | CPB |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $284M | $6.8B |
| Share price | $3.50 | $22.77 |
| Change, 1 year | −25.1% | −27.0% |
| Change, 5 years | −88.6% | −43.9% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.49 | 0.09 |
| Employees | 2,497 | 14K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 10 | 10 |
| Valuation score | 3 | 3 |
| Growth score | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Performance score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Health score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend score | 4 | 5 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 17.4× |
| P/S | 0.2× (better) | 0.7× |
| P/B | 0.8× (better) | 1.8× |
| EV/EBITDA | 17.9× | 10.7× (better) |
| P/FCF | 2.9× (better) | 10.0× |
| FCF yield | 35.0% (better) | 10.0% |
| Fair value | $13.74 | $28.43 |
| Margin of safety | 74.5% (better) | 19.9% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −2.7% (better) | −5.0% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | −1.5% | 2.8% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | −33.1% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | −34.8% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | −16.8% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 21.8% | 28.1% (better) |
| Operating margin | 3.7% | 8.7% (better) |
| Net margin | −4.7% | 4.1% (better) |
| FCF margin | 5.6% | 7.0% (better) |
| Return on equity | −20.4% | 10.4% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 2.2% | 6.1% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 5.75 | 1.85 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 15.68 | 5.33 (better) |
| Interest coverage | – | 2.6× |
| Current ratio | 2.84 (better) | 0.82 |
| Altman Z-score | 1.14 | 1.52 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 6 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 16.3% (better) | 6.2% |
| Payout ratio | – | 117% |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | −16.7% | 1.3% (better) |
| Buyback yield | – | 0.38% |
| Shareholder yield | 16.3% (better) | 6.6% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 57.3% | 62.1% |
| Held by insiders | 5.3% | 38.5% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$248K (better) | −$390K |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 18.4% | 21.1% |
Go deeper
- BGS stock overview
- BGS income statement
- BGS valuation and score
- CPB stock overview
- CPB income statement
- CPB valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.