BGC vs Tradeweb Markets
BGC and TW side by side, both in security & commodity brokers, dealers, exchanges & services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How BGC and TW compare
Tradeweb Markets is the larger company, worth 5.8 times as much as BGC ($30.3B against $5.3B).
On earnings, BGC is cheaper: it trades at 22.6× trailing earnings, against 30.7× for Tradeweb Markets.
BGC grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (22.9% versus 14.4% for Tradeweb Markets).
Tradeweb Markets keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 39.8% compared with 7.1% at BGC.
Both pay dividends: BGC yields 0.72% and Tradeweb Markets 0.41%.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | BGC | TW |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $5.3B | $30.3B |
| Share price | $11.07 | $130.60 |
| Change, 1 year | 19.7% | 19.3% |
| Change, 5 years | 138% | 33.4% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.01 | 0.65 |
| Employees | 4,560 | 1,569 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 17 | 17 |
| Valuation score | 4 (better) | 3 |
| Growth score | 4 (better) | 3 |
| Performance score | 4 | 4 |
| Health score | 2 | 5 (better) |
| Dividend score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 22.6× (better) | 30.7× |
| P/S | 1.6× (better) | 13.3× |
| P/B | 4.8× | 4.6× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 14.4× (better) | 23.1× |
| P/FCF | 9.5× (better) | 26.3× |
| PEG | 0.67 (better) | 0.84 |
| FCF yield | 10.5% (better) | 3.8% |
| Fair value | $13.09 | $133.05 |
| Margin of safety | 15.4% (better) | 1.8% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 22.9% (better) | 14.4% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 7.4% | 18.1% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 49.5% (better) | 44.3% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 48.5% (better) | 45.9% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 20.9% | 33.8% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Operating margin | – | 44.1% |
| Net margin | 7.1% | 39.8% (better) |
| FCF margin | 16.3% | 50.6% (better) |
| Return on equity | 23.6% (better) | 14.1% |
| Return on invested capital | – | 17.7% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 1.63 (better) | 0.00 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 2.15 | – |
| Interest coverage | – | 490× |
| Altman Z-score | 1.12 | 17.55 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 7 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 0.72% (better) | 0.41% |
| Payout ratio | 15.9% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 2 | 3 (better) |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | −14.0% | 8.4% (better) |
| Buyback yield | 5.8% (better) | 1.8% |
| Shareholder yield | 6.5% (better) | 2.2% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 65.4% | 50.4% |
| Held by insiders | 48.6% | 51.9% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$95.5K (better) | −$46.9M |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 2 |
| Short interest, % of float | 3.8% | 3.2% |
Go deeper
- BGC stock overview
- BGC income statement
- BGC valuation and score
- TW stock overview
- TW income statement
- TW valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.