Saul Centers vs Safehold
BFS and SAFE side by side, both in miscellaneous investing. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How BFS and SAFE compare
Saul Centers and Safehold are about the same size, with market caps of $706M and $742M.
On earnings, Safehold is cheaper: it trades at 6.5× trailing earnings, against 31.0× for Saul Centers.
Safehold grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (16.5% versus 9.2% for Saul Centers).
Safehold keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 26.2% compared with 11.0% at Saul Centers.
Both pay dividends: Saul Centers yields 8.3% and Safehold 6.8%.
Safehold scores higher on the StockData Score (20 against 10 for Saul Centers), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | BFS | SAFE |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $706M | $742M |
| Share price | $28.56 | $10.48 |
| Change, 1 year | −4.1% | −21.3% |
| Change, 5 years | −45.7% | −91.0% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.75 | 1.00 |
| Employees | 70 | 72 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 10 | 20 (better) |
| Valuation score | 2 | 6 (better) |
| Growth score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Performance score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Health score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Dividend score | 4 | 5 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 31.0× | 6.5× (better) |
| P/S | 2.3× | 1.7× (better) |
| P/B | 2.4× | 0.3× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 3.2× (better) | 7.7× |
| Fair value | $55.72 | $25.96 |
| Margin of safety | 48.7% | 59.6% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 9.2% | 16.5% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 5.2% (better) | 3.5% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −13.4% | 2.7% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −20.7% | 3.2% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | −2.7% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | – | 99.1% |
| Operating margin | 66.7% (better) | 24.9% |
| Net margin | 11.0% | 26.2% (better) |
| Return on equity | 11.1% (better) | 4.8% |
| Return on invested capital | 55.4% (better) | 4.4% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 0.00 |
| Interest coverage | 2.8× | – |
| Altman Z-score | 0.47 (better) | 0.23 |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 5 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 8.3% (better) | 6.8% |
| Payout ratio | 170% | 44.1% |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 2.2% | 10.5% (better) |
| Buyback yield | −0.81% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 7.5% (better) | 6.8% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 47.6% | 68.7% |
| Held by insiders | 4.2% | 4.1% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $104K (better) | −$138K |
| Short interest, % of float | 2.3% | 4.9% |
Go deeper
- BFS stock overview
- BFS income statement
- BFS valuation and score
- SAFE stock overview
- SAFE income statement
- SAFE valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.