Brandywine Realty Trust vs Safehold
BDN and SAFE side by side, both in miscellaneous investing. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How BDN and SAFE compare
Safehold is the larger company, worth 1.4 times as much as Brandywine Realty Trust ($742M against $529M).
Safehold grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (16.5% versus 3.5% for Brandywine Realty Trust).
Safehold keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 26.2% compared with −27.6% at Brandywine Realty Trust.
Both pay dividends: Brandywine Realty Trust yields 10.3% and Safehold 6.8%.
Safehold scores higher on the StockData Score (20 against 13 for Brandywine Realty Trust), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | BDN | SAFE |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $529M | $742M |
| Share price | $3.11 | $10.48 |
| Change, 1 year | −8.0% | −21.3% |
| Change, 5 years | −78.0% | −91.0% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.99 | 1.00 |
| Employees | 268 | 72 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 13 | 20 (better) |
| Valuation score | 4 | 6 (better) |
| Growth score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Performance score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Health score | 4 | 4 |
| Dividend score | 3 | 5 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 6.5× |
| P/S | 1.1× (better) | 1.7× |
| P/B | 0.8× | 0.3× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 0.8× (better) | 7.7× |
| Fair value | $10.24 | $25.96 |
| Margin of safety | 69.6% (better) | 59.6% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 3.5% | 16.5% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | −2.0% | 3.5% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 2.7% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | 3.2% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 59.5% | 99.1% (better) |
| Operating margin | 19.0% | 24.9% (better) |
| Net margin | −27.6% | 26.2% (better) |
| Return on equity | −18.6% | 4.8% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 13.8% (better) | 4.4% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Altman Z-score | 0.37 (better) | 0.23 |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 5 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 10.3% (better) | 6.8% |
| Payout ratio | – | 44.1% |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | −7.0% | 10.5% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 10.3% (better) | 6.8% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 75.2% | 68.7% |
| Held by insiders | 5.0% | 4.1% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $100K (better) | −$138K |
| Short interest, % of float | 4.2% | 4.9% |
Go deeper
- BDN stock overview
- BDN income statement
- BDN valuation and score
- SAFE stock overview
- SAFE income statement
- SAFE valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.