Brandywine Realty Trust vs First Industrial Realty Trust
BDN and FR side by side, both in miscellaneous investing. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How BDN and FR compare
First Industrial Realty Trust is the larger company, worth 14 times as much as Brandywine Realty Trust ($7.3B against $529M).
First Industrial Realty Trust grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (8.5% versus 3.5% for Brandywine Realty Trust).
First Industrial Realty Trust keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 46.1% compared with −27.6% at Brandywine Realty Trust.
Both pay dividends: Brandywine Realty Trust yields 10.3% and First Industrial Realty Trust 3.5%.
First Industrial Realty Trust scores higher on the StockData Score (17 against 13 for Brandywine Realty Trust), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | BDN | FR |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $529M | $7.3B |
| Share price | $3.11 | $55.26 |
| Change, 1 year | −8.0% | −1.4% |
| Change, 5 years | −78.0% | −9.7% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.99 | 0.84 |
| Employees | 268 | 152 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 13 | 17 (better) |
| Valuation score | 4 (better) | 3 |
| Growth score | 1 | 4 (better) |
| Performance score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Health score | 4 | 4 |
| Dividend score | 3 | 3 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 20.5× |
| P/S | 1.1× (better) | 9.4× |
| P/B | 0.8× (better) | 2.6× |
| EV/EBITDA | 0.8× (better) | 13.3× |
| Fair value | $10.24 | $54.79 |
| Margin of safety | 69.6% (better) | −0.86% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 3.5% | 8.5% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | −2.0% | 10.2% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 50.9% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | 50.3% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 4.1% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 59.5% | – |
| Operating margin | 19.0% | – |
| Net margin | −27.6% | 46.1% (better) |
| Return on equity | −18.6% | 13.2% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 13.8% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Altman Z-score | 0.37 | 1.67 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 5 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 10.3% (better) | 3.5% |
| Payout ratio | – | 71.8% |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | 13 (better) |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | −7.0% | 12.2% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 10.3% (better) | 3.5% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 75.2% | 100% |
| Held by insiders | 5.0% | 0.37% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $100K (better) | −$39.7K |
| Short interest, % of float | 4.2% | 3.7% |
Go deeper
- BDN stock overview
- BDN income statement
- BDN valuation and score
- FR stock overview
- FR income statement
- FR valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.