BigBear.ai vs Red Violet
BBAI and RDVT side by side, both in computer programming, data processing, and other computer related services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How BBAI and RDVT compare
Red Violet is the larger company, worth 1.2 times as much as BigBear.ai ($1.2B against $996M).
Red Violet grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (20.0% versus −1.5% for BigBear.ai).
Red Violet keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 17.0% compared with −127% at BigBear.ai.
Red Violet scores higher on the StockData Score (15 against 6 for BigBear.ai), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | BBAI | RDVT |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $996M | $1.2B |
| Share price | $2.07 | $76.00 |
| Change, 1 year | −65.8% | 31.1% |
| Change, 5 years | −79.3% | 87.9% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.94 | 1.09 |
| Employees | 579 | 250 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 6 | 15 (better) |
| Valuation score | 1 | 1 |
| Growth score | 1 | 4 (better) |
| Performance score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Health score | 4 | 6 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 63.9× |
| P/S | 7.0× (better) | 11.8× |
| P/B | 1.5× (better) | 5.4× |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 37.0× |
| P/FCF | – | 33.7× |
| PEG | – | 0.35 |
| FCF yield | −7.3% | 3.0% (better) |
| Fair value | – | $53.95 |
| Margin of safety | – | −40.9% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −1.5% | 20.0% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | – | 21.1% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 57.2% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | 54.5% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 30.2% | 85.0% (better) |
| Operating margin | −164% | 18.2% (better) |
| Net margin | −127% | 17.0% (better) |
| FCF margin | −51.2% | 34.9% (better) |
| Return on equity | −27.9% | 10.7% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | −41.9% | 17.6% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.02 (better) | 0.00 |
| Interest coverage | −47.5× | – |
| Current ratio | 4.92 | 16.21 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 5.52 | 71.93 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 | 8 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 0.00% |
| Buyback yield | 0.00% | 0.28% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 0.28% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 39.1% | 62.5% |
| Held by insiders | 85.7% | 16.2% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$528K (better) | −$2.5M |
| Short interest, % of float | 201% | 4.2% |
Go deeper
- BBAI stock overview
- BBAI income statement
- BBAI valuation and score
- RDVT stock overview
- RDVT income statement
- RDVT valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.