Avery Dennison vs Ranpak
AVY and PACK side by side, both in paper and allied products. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How AVY and PACK compare
Avery Dennison is the larger company, worth 47 times as much as Ranpak ($14.3B against $305M).
Ranpak grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (8.3% versus 5.8% for Avery Dennison).
Avery Dennison keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 7.6% compared with −8.3% at Ranpak.
Avery Dennison pays a dividend yielding 2.1%; Ranpak does not pay one.
Avery Dennison scores higher on the StockData Score (13 against 6 for Ranpak), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | AVY | PACK |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $14.3B | $305M |
| Share price | $188.18 | $3.55 |
| Change, 1 year | 8.4% | −29.0% |
| Change, 5 years | −13.9% | −91.6% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.75 | 2.02 |
| Employees | 25K | 800 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 13 (better) | 6 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Growth score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Performance score | 4 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Dividend score | 4 (better) | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 20.6× | – |
| P/S | 1.5× | 0.7× (better) |
| P/B | 6.1× | 0.6× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 12.2× (better) | 14.9× |
| P/FCF | 13.4× | – |
| FCF yield | 7.5% | – |
| Fair value | $158.27 | $4.17 |
| Margin of safety | −18.9% | 14.9% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 5.8% | 8.3% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 4.9% | 5.8% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −0.86% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 2.4% | – |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 5.9% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 29.0% | 33.8% (better) |
| Operating margin | – | −1.7% |
| Net margin | 7.6% (better) | −8.3% |
| FCF margin | 11.5% | – |
| Return on equity | 31.2% (better) | −6.6% |
| Return on invested capital | – | −0.64% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 1.58 | 0.79 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 2.38 (better) | 8.01 |
| Interest coverage | – | −0.2× |
| Current ratio | 1.13 | 1.79 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 3.19 (better) | 0.48 |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 (better) | 4 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 2.1% | – |
| Payout ratio | 41.7% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 15 | – |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 9.4% | – |
| Buyback yield | 2.9% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 4.9% (better) | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 98.3% | 89.9% |
| Held by insiders | 0.62% | 45.3% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$22.0M | −$18.7K (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 2.8% | 4.2% |
Go deeper
- AVY stock overview
- AVY income statement
- AVY valuation and score
- PACK stock overview
- PACK income statement
- PACK valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.