Aviat Networks vs Ubiquiti
AVNW and UI side by side, both in communications equipment. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How AVNW and UI compare
Ubiquiti is the larger company, worth 183 times as much as Aviat Networks ($40.5B against $222M).
Ubiquiti grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (29.4% versus −4.2% for Aviat Networks).
Ubiquiti keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 30.1% compared with −0.10% at Aviat Networks.
Ubiquiti pays a dividend yielding 0.51%; Aviat Networks does not pay one.
Ubiquiti scores higher on the StockData Score (22 against 7 for Aviat Networks), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | AVNW | UI |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $222M | $40.5B |
| Share price | $17.35 | $669.76 |
| Change, 1 year | −24.9% | 14.5% |
| Change, 5 years | −42.4% | 125% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.97 | 1.16 |
| Employees | 900 | 1,321 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 7 | 22 (better) |
| Valuation score | 2 | 2 |
| Growth score | 0 | 5 (better) |
| Performance score | 2 | 5 (better) |
| Health score | 3 | 6 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 37.8× |
| P/S | 0.5× (better) | 11.4× |
| P/B | 0.8× (better) | 24.1× |
| EV/EBITDA | 13.3× (better) | 29.8× |
| P/FCF | 18.0× (better) | 39.4× |
| PEG | – | 1.15 |
| FCF yield | 5.6% (better) | 2.5% |
| Fair value | $21.16 | $559.95 |
| Margin of safety | 18.0% (better) | −19.6% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −4.2% | 29.4% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 9.8% | 11.5% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −103% | 35.5% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −104% | 35.5% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | −54.2% | 10.1% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 30.6% | 46.5% (better) |
| Operating margin | 3.4% | 36.9% (better) |
| Net margin | −0.10% | 30.1% (better) |
| FCF margin | 2.8% | 28.8% (better) |
| Return on equity | −0.17% | 85.4% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 2.5% | 131% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.32 (better) | 0.00 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 1.60 | – |
| Current ratio | 2.07 | 3.13 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 0.32 | 34.59 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 6 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 0.51% |
| Payout ratio | – | 19.2% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 1 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 14.9% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 0.51% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 84.6% | 4.9% |
| Held by insiders | 6.3% | 0.00% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$951K | −$340K (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 9.1% | 0.57% |
Go deeper
- AVNW stock overview
- AVNW income statement
- AVNW valuation and score
- UI stock overview
- UI income statement
- UI valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.