Aura Minerals vs Ero Copper
AUGO and ERO side by side, both in materials. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How AUGO and ERO compare
Ero Copper grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (67.1% versus 55.1% for Aura Minerals).
Ero Copper scores higher on the StockData Score (14 against 6 for Aura Minerals), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | AUGO | ERO |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Share price | $81.40 | $30.92 |
| Change, 1 year | 127% | 39.8% |
| Change, 5 years | 797% | 69.9% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.96 | 1.38 |
| Employees | 1,462 | – |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 6 | 14 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 2 | 4 (better) |
| Performance score | 0 | 6 (better) |
| Health score | 4 | 4 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 55.1% | 67.1% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | – | 19.4% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 35.2% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 58.0% (better) | 43.9% |
| Operating margin | – | 34.4% |
| Net margin | – | 33.6% |
| FCF margin | – | 16.8% |
| Return on equity | – | 34.6% |
| Return on invested capital | – | 16.9% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 0.65 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | 1.30 |
| Interest coverage | – | 8.1× |
| Current ratio | 0.97 | 1.06 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | – | 8 |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 30.6% | 67.3% |
| Held by insiders | 52.3% | 0.00% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$153M | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 14.0% | 6.3% |
Go deeper
- AUGO stock overview
- AUGO income statement
- AUGO valuation and score
- ERO stock overview
- ERO income statement
- ERO valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.