Academy Sports & Outdoors vs Dillard's
ASO and DDS side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How ASO and DDS compare
Dillard's is the larger company, worth 2.3 times as much as Academy Sports & Outdoors ($9.9B against $4.3B).
Academy Sports & Outdoors grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (3.7% versus 0.21% for Dillard's).
Dillard's keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 10.3% compared with 6.4% at Academy Sports & Outdoors.
Both pay dividends: Academy Sports & Outdoors yields 0.84% and Dillard's 0.19%.
Academy Sports & Outdoors scores higher on the StockData Score (17 against 11 for Dillard's), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | ASO | DDS |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $4.3B | $9.9B |
| Share price | $69.32 | $634.33 |
| Change, 1 year | 54.6% | 4.6% |
| Change, 5 years | 38.3% | 76.1% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.23 | 1.32 |
| Employees | 23K | 29K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 17 (better) | 11 |
| Valuation score | 3 (better) | 1 |
| Growth score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Performance score | 5 (better) | 3 |
| Health score | 4 (better) | 2 |
| Dividend score | 3 | 4 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 11.6× | – |
| P/S | 0.7× (better) | 1.5× |
| P/B | 2.0× (better) | 4.7× |
| EV/EBITDA | 6.2× (better) | 8.6× |
| P/FCF | 12.9× (better) | 15.6× |
| FCF yield | 7.8% (better) | 6.4% |
| Fair value | $78.15 | $742.20 |
| Margin of safety | 11.3% | 14.5% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 3.7% (better) | 0.21% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 1.2% | 8.2% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 6.7% | 18.4% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 12.2% | – |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 7.9% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 35.8% | 39.8% (better) |
| Operating margin | 9.6% | – |
| Net margin | 6.4% | 10.3% (better) |
| FCF margin | 5.4% | 9.6% (better) |
| Return on equity | 18.6% | 33.8% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 20.0% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.23 | – |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 0.27 | – |
| Current ratio | 1.74 | 3.03 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 2.93 | 8.47 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 (better) | 6 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 0.84% (better) | 0.19% |
| Payout ratio | 9.2% | 71.3% |
| Years of dividend growth | 3 | 12 (better) |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 120% |
| Buyback yield | 6.6% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 7.4% (better) | 0.19% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 119% | 53.6% |
| Held by insiders | 1.5% | 47.0% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$7.0M | −$244K (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 13.2% | – |
Go deeper
- ASO stock overview
- ASO income statement
- ASO valuation and score
- DDS stock overview
- DDS income statement
- DDS valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.