Arm vs Cirrus Logic
ARM and CRUS side by side, both in electronic components and accessories. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How ARM and CRUS compare
Arm grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (23.8% versus 5.1% for Cirrus Logic).
Cirrus Logic keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 20.2% compared with 17.1% at Arm.
Cirrus Logic scores higher on the StockData Score (20 against 12 for Arm), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | ARM | CRUS |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | – | $6.0B |
| Share price | $190.53 | $120.19 |
| Change, 1 year | 28.1% | −1.0% |
| Change, 5 years | – | 47.2% |
| Beta (5Y) | 2.93 | 1.12 |
| Employees | 9,584 | 1,668 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 12 | 20 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 6 (better) |
| Growth score | 4 (better) | 2 |
| Performance score | 3 | 6 (better) |
| Health score | 5 | 6 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 15.2× |
| P/S | – | 2.9× |
| P/B | – | 2.7× |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 10.3× |
| P/FCF | – | 11.4× |
| PEG | – | 0.42 |
| FCF yield | – | 8.7% |
| Fair value | – | $174.32 |
| Margin of safety | – | 31.1% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 23.8% (better) | 5.1% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | – | 7.8% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 12.8% (better) | 9.0% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 11.5% | 12.6% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 16.7% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 97.4% (better) | 53.1% |
| Operating margin | 16.7% | 22.5% (better) |
| Net margin | 17.1% | 20.2% (better) |
| FCF margin | 22.2% | 25.7% (better) |
| Return on equity | 11.3% | 19.5% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 15.2% | 26.1% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Interest coverage | – | 452× |
| Current ratio | 6.35 | 6.41 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | – | 11.16 |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 | 9 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | – | 5.0% |
| Shareholder yield | – | 5.0% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 9.3% | 106% |
| Held by insiders | 86.8% | 0.64% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$72.2M | −$12.4M (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | 2 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | – | 7.6% |
Go deeper
- ARM stock overview
- ARM income statement
- ARM valuation and score
- CRUS stock overview
- CRUS income statement
- CRUS valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.