Apogee Enterprises vs Eagle Materials
APOG and EXP side by side, both in materials. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How APOG and EXP compare
Eagle Materials is the larger company, worth 5.6 times as much as Apogee Enterprises ($5.7B against $1.0B).
On earnings, Apogee Enterprises is cheaper: it trades at 15.2× trailing earnings, against 15.3× for Eagle Materials.
Apogee Enterprises grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (3.0% versus 1.6% for Eagle Materials).
Eagle Materials keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 16.1% compared with 4.7% at Apogee Enterprises.
Both pay dividends: Apogee Enterprises yields 2.3% and Eagle Materials 0.54%.
Apogee Enterprises scores higher on the StockData Score (17 against 12 for Eagle Materials), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | APOG | EXP |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $1.0B | $5.7B |
| Share price | $47.91 | $184.24 |
| Change, 1 year | 39.8% | −10.9% |
| Change, 5 years | 2.7% | 14.3% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.96 | 1.12 |
| Employees | 4,100 | 2,800 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 17 (better) | 12 |
| Valuation score | 3 | 3 |
| Growth score | 4 (better) | 0 |
| Performance score | 3 | 4 (better) |
| Health score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Dividend score | 4 (better) | 3 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 15.2× (better) | 15.3× |
| P/S | 0.7× (better) | 2.4× |
| P/B | 1.9× (better) | 3.7× |
| EV/EBITDA | 8.4× | – |
| P/FCF | 10.5× (better) | 36.3× |
| PEG | – | 8.32 |
| FCF yield | 9.5% (better) | 2.8% |
| Fair value | $59.09 | $197.12 |
| Margin of safety | 18.9% (better) | 6.5% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 3.0% (better) | 1.6% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 2.7% | 7.3% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 51.0% (better) | −15.7% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 54.9% (better) | −11.1% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 33.7% (better) | 10.1% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 23.2% | 25.8% (better) |
| Operating margin | 7.2% | – |
| Net margin | 4.7% | 16.1% (better) |
| FCF margin | 6.6% | 6.6% (better) |
| Return on equity | 13.1% | 24.5% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 9.5% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.64 (better) | 1.14 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 1.93 | – |
| Interest coverage | 8.3× | – |
| Current ratio | 1.78 | 3.29 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 2.89 (better) | 2.71 |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 (better) | 5 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 2.3% (better) | 0.54% |
| Payout ratio | 33.3% | 8.3% |
| Years of dividend growth | 14 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 6.6% | 58.5% (better) |
| Buyback yield | 3.1% | 6.4% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 5.4% | 6.9% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 93.4% | 108% |
| Held by insiders | 3.0% | 1.2% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$51.5K (better) | −$1.7M |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 2 |
| Short interest, % of float | 4.2% | 6.2% |
Go deeper
- APOG stock overview
- APOG income statement
- APOG valuation and score
- EXP stock overview
- EXP income statement
- EXP valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.