Ampco Pittsburgh vs Flowserve
AP and FLS side by side, both in general industrial machinery and equipment. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How AP and FLS compare
Flowserve is the larger company, worth 71 times as much as Ampco Pittsburgh ($10.8B against $152M).
Flowserve pays a dividend yielding 1.0%; Ampco Pittsburgh does not pay one.
Flowserve scores higher on the StockData Score (13 against 2 for Ampco Pittsburgh), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | AP | FLS |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $152M | $10.8B |
| Share price | $7.34 | $85.20 |
| Change, 1 year | 276% | 22.2% |
| Change, 5 years | 47.1% | 163% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.29 | 1.25 |
| Employees | 1,432 | 16K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 2 | 13 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Performance score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Health score | 2 | 4 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 42.8× |
| P/S | 0.4× | – |
| P/B | 4.7× | 4.7× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 21.1× |
| P/FCF | 12.8× (better) | 70.3× |
| PEG | – | 1.91 |
| FCF yield | 7.8% (better) | 1.4% |
| Fair value | – | $56.73 |
| Margin of safety | – | −50.2% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 1.3% | – |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 5.7% | – |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | −43.7% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | −42.2% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 21.4% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 18.9% | – |
| Operating margin | −10.2% | – |
| Net margin | −13.1% | – |
| FCF margin | 2.7% | – |
| Return on equity | −123% | 11.1% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | −21.6% | 11.3% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 3.76 | 0.89 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | 2.28 |
| Interest coverage | −4.0× | 5.1× (better) |
| Current ratio | 1.68 | 2.10 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 0.66 | 3.17 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 3 | 6 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 1.0% |
| Payout ratio | – | 43.1% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 0 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 0.98% |
| Buyback yield | – | 1.2% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 2.2% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 55.7% | 113% |
| Held by insiders | 44.8% | 0.63% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $29.4K (better) | −$15.7M |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 3 |
| Short interest, % of float | 6.1% | 6.9% |
Go deeper
- AP stock overview
- AP income statement
- AP valuation and score
- FLS stock overview
- FLS income statement
- FLS valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.