Amkor Technology vs ON Semiconductor
AMKR and ON side by side, both in electronic components and accessories. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How AMKR and ON compare
ON Semiconductor is the larger company, worth 3.1 times as much as Amkor Technology ($27.7B against $8.9B).
On earnings, Amkor Technology is cheaper: it trades at 14.6× trailing earnings, against 41.3× for ON Semiconductor.
Amkor Technology grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (15.7% versus 2.9% for ON Semiconductor).
ON Semiconductor keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 10.8% compared with 8.3% at Amkor Technology.
Amkor Technology pays a dividend yielding 0.93%; ON Semiconductor does not pay one.
Amkor Technology scores higher on the StockData Score (17 against 9 for ON Semiconductor), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | AMKR | ON |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $8.9B | $27.7B |
| Share price | $36.11 | $71.06 |
| Change, 1 year | 4.8% | 44.2% |
| Change, 5 years | 43.0% | 12.2% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.98 | 1.62 |
| Employees | 31K | 26K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 17 (better) | 9 |
| Valuation score | 5 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 2 | 2 |
| Performance score | 5 (better) | 2 |
| Health score | 3 | 5 (better) |
| Dividend score | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 14.6× (better) | 41.3× |
| P/S | 1.2× (better) | 4.3× |
| P/B | 1.9× (better) | 3.7× |
| EV/EBITDA | 6.4× (better) | 17.8× |
| P/FCF | – | 17.1× |
| FCF yield | −1.7% | 5.8% (better) |
| Fair value | $65.65 | $53.28 |
| Margin of safety | 45.0% (better) | −33.4% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 15.7% (better) | 2.9% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 5.8% (better) | 2.7% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 101% | 116% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 98.4% | 123% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 1.4% (better) | −12.3% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 16.6% | 38.7% (better) |
| Operating margin | 9.5% | 12.3% (better) |
| Net margin | 8.3% | 10.8% (better) |
| FCF margin | −2.1% | 25.4% (better) |
| Return on equity | 13.6% (better) | 8.9% |
| Return on invested capital | 14.1% (better) | 7.7% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.51 (better) | 0.59 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 0.06 | 0.06 (better) |
| Interest coverage | 9.7× | 13.6× (better) |
| Current ratio | 2.17 | 3.55 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 2.73 | 4.62 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 (better) | 4 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 0.93% | – |
| Payout ratio | 13.4% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | – |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 52.7% | – |
| Buyback yield | – | 4.2% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.93% | 4.2% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 46.9% | 104% |
| Held by insiders | 30.9% | 0.52% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$991M | −$21.3M (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 7.4% | 7.4% |
Go deeper
- AMKR stock overview
- AMKR income statement
- AMKR valuation and score
- ON stock overview
- ON income statement
- ON valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.