Alta Equipment vs MSC Industrial Direct
ALTG and MSM side by side, both in wholesale trade-durable goods. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How ALTG and MSM compare
MSC Industrial Direct is the larger company, worth 38 times as much as Alta Equipment ($6.8B against $179M).
MSC Industrial Direct grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (6.4% versus −0.68% for Alta Equipment).
MSC Industrial Direct keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 5.6% compared with −2.8% at Alta Equipment.
MSC Industrial Direct pays a dividend yielding 2.9%; Alta Equipment does not pay one.
MSC Industrial Direct scores higher on the StockData Score (13 against 6 for Alta Equipment), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | ALTG | MSM |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $179M | $6.8B |
| Share price | $5.49 | $120.87 |
| Change, 1 year | 9.6% | 36.8% |
| Change, 5 years | −67.4% | 44.1% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.59 | 0.79 |
| Employees | 2,750 | 7,028 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 6 | 13 (better) |
| Valuation score | 4 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Performance score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Health score | 1 | 6 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 30.4× |
| P/S | 0.1× (better) | 1.7× |
| P/B | – | 4.7× |
| EV/EBITDA | 4.4× (better) | 17.0× |
| P/FCF | 2.1× (better) | 30.0× |
| FCF yield | 46.9% (better) | 3.3% |
| Fair value | $23.90 | $77.53 |
| Margin of safety | 77.0% (better) | −55.9% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −0.68% | 6.4% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 16.0% (better) | 4.3% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 11.7% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | 11.5% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 0.56% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 25.9% | 40.9% (better) |
| Operating margin | 1.0% | 8.0% (better) |
| Net margin | −2.8% | 5.6% (better) |
| FCF margin | 4.6% | 5.6% (better) |
| Return on equity | – | 15.8% |
| Return on invested capital | 3.2% | 13.2% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 0.33 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 3.19 | 0.98 (better) |
| Interest coverage | 0.2× | 14.8× (better) |
| Current ratio | 1.35 | 1.78 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 1.39 | 6.29 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 8 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 2.9% (better) |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | – |
| Buyback yield | – | 0.21% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 3.1% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 64.9% | 83.4% |
| Held by insiders | 44.9% | 10.8% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $468K | $28.9M (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 3.8% | 3.9% |
Go deeper
- ALTG stock overview
- ALTG income statement
- ALTG valuation and score
- MSM stock overview
- MSM income statement
- MSM valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.