Allison Transmission vs Cooper-Standard
ALSN and CPS side by side, both in motor vehicles and motor vehicle equipment. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How ALSN and CPS compare
Allison Transmission is the larger company, worth 31 times as much as Cooper-Standard ($10.5B against $333M).
Allison Transmission grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (70.8% versus 27.9% for Cooper-Standard).
Allison Transmission keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 11.1% compared with −1.7% at Cooper-Standard.
Allison Transmission pays a dividend yielding 0.90%; Cooper-Standard does not pay one.
Allison Transmission scores higher on the StockData Score (14 against 5 for Cooper-Standard), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | ALSN | CPS |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $10.5B | $333M |
| Share price | $126.69 | $18.72 |
| Change, 1 year | 54.4% | −40.5% |
| Change, 5 years | 250% | −22.6% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.73 | 2.35 |
| Employees | 4,000 | 22K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 14 (better) | 5 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Growth score | 2 | 2 |
| Performance score | 5 (better) | 1 |
| Health score | 3 (better) | 1 |
| Dividend score | 4 (better) | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 18.3× | – |
| P/S | 2.0× | 0.1× (better) |
| P/B | 5.0× | – |
| EV/EBITDA | 14.5× | 13.4× (better) |
| P/FCF | 12.6× | – |
| PEG | 1.85 | – |
| FCF yield | 7.9% (better) | −8.5% |
| Fair value | $81.37 | – |
| Margin of safety | −55.7% | – |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 70.8% (better) | 27.9% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 7.7% | – |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −16.6% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −14.7% | – |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 22.8% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 33.9% (better) | 12.0% |
| Operating margin | 18.3% (better) | 2.9% |
| Net margin | 11.1% (better) | −1.7% |
| FCF margin | 15.8% (better) | −0.81% |
| Return on equity | 29.7% | – |
| Return on invested capital | 16.8% (better) | 9.3% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 1.93 | – |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 3.66 (better) | 10.21 |
| Current ratio | 1.77 (better) | 1.31 |
| Altman Z-score | 2.08 (better) | 1.85 |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | 6 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 0.90% | – |
| Payout ratio | 16.1% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 3 | – |
| Buyback yield | 1.6% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 2.5% (better) | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 104% | 64.9% |
| Held by insiders | 0.76% | 5.5% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$6.0M | $225K (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | 2 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 2.9% | 4.5% |
Go deeper
- ALSN stock overview
- ALSN income statement
- ALSN valuation and score
- CPS stock overview
- CPS income statement
- CPS valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.