American International vs CNA Financial
AIG and CNA side by side, both in fire, marine, and casualty insurance. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How AIG and CNA compare
American International is the larger company, worth 3.3 times as much as CNA Financial ($43.3B against $13.1B).
On earnings, CNA Financial is cheaper: it trades at 12.8× trailing earnings, against 13.5× for American International.
CNA Financial grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (2.1% versus 1.2% for American International).
Both pay dividends: American International yields 2.3% and CNA Financial 8.0%.
CNA Financial scores higher on the StockData Score (11 against 2 for American International), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | AIG | CNA |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $43.3B | $13.1B |
| Share price | $82.86 | $48.55 |
| Change, 1 year | 6.2% | 5.6% |
| Change, 5 years | 50.8% | 11.1% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.70 | 0.40 |
| Employees | 22K | 6,600 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 2 | 11 (better) |
| Valuation score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Growth score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Performance score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Health score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Dividend score | 1 | 4 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 13.5× | 12.8× (better) |
| P/S | 1.6× | 0.9× (better) |
| P/B | 1.1× (better) | 1.3× |
| EV/EBITDA | 5.2× (better) | 10.5× |
| P/FCF | – | 6.0× |
| PEG | – | 0.55 |
| FCF yield | – | 16.6% |
| Fair value | $82.13 | $47.22 |
| Margin of safety | −0.88% (better) | −2.8% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 1.2% | 2.1% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | −9.3% | 6.8% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 3.3% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 11.6% (better) | 3.6% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 13.1% |
| Profitability | ||
| Net margin | – | 6.8% |
| FCF margin | – | 14.4% |
| Return on equity | – | 9.6% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 0.29 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | 1.75 |
| Altman Z-score | 0.72 (better) | 0.56 |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 | 7 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 2.3% | 8.0% (better) |
| Payout ratio | – | 104% |
| Years of dividend growth | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 40.5% (better) | 2.0% |
| Buyback yield | 5.2% (better) | 0.27% |
| Shareholder yield | 7.5% | 8.3% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 95.7% | 101% |
| Held by insiders | 0.29% | 0.50% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$18.1M | −$5.4M (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 2.3% | 1.5% |
Go deeper
- AIG stock overview
- AIG income statement
- AIG valuation and score
- CNA stock overview
- CNA income statement
- CNA valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.